Finally !!! ASK QUESTIONS, DEMAND ANSWERS.

Quote from total180:

It just doesn't’t add up. Hence, total180 (someone had asked in a pm long time ago).
I too was not predisposed to refute the official version -- served in the Air Force; trusted US foreign policy; voted for Bush in 2000 and had always voted republican; donated money to families of 911 victims; participated to a vigil; initialy cheered the invasion of Afghanistan but by January 2002, there were too many questions.
 
Well stated - Cheers

Quote from total180:

Ohh Please...spare the excuse...
Didn’t Baron create chitchat to discuss “controversial issues” that don’t belong in the trading forums and as many wanted “to let off some steam?”
 
Quote from JAGUARBONE:

Well stated - Cheers

Quote from total180:

Ohh Please...spare the excuse...
Didn’t Baron create chitchat to discuss “controversial issues” that don’t belong in the trading forums and as many wanted “to let off some steam?”
Apparently some "controversial issues" are too controversial for a certain moderator, with Baron's approval.

If Pabst were to delete this thread, it might give the lefties a taste of their own medicine.
 
I would think any potential sponsor whom "were to stumble upon this shit and see how many stupid, insane, vindictive members this site contains", with the need and ability to utilize their services and products...
Well hell, you finish the line.

Sponsor happy, Baron VERY happy, moderator unsettled.
 
"Unable to absorb the massive energy, that floor would fail, transmitting the forces to the floor below, allowing the collapse to progress downward through the building in a chain reaction. Engineers call the process "pancaking," and it does not require an explosion to begin,"

Wouldn't each level provide some kind of resistance to prevent free falling collapse?

All 3 buildings perfectly collapse.

One of the tallest buildings began to fall to a side and all of a sudden free fall. What force stopped it from falling to a side?
 
Anyone stupid enough to actually believe this shit couldn't stay alive trading for a living more than a week. Sponsors on this site tend to be brokerages and trading related venders.
Quote from JAGUARBONE:

I would think any potential sponsor whom "were to stumble upon this shit and see how many stupid, insane, vindictive members this site contains", with the need and ability to utilize their services and products...
Well hell, you finish the line.

Sponsor happy, Baron VERY happy, moderator unsettled.
 
- moderator unsettled -Sponsor uneffected and signing another ad contract - Baron VERY happy .

Gee, money from a dumb ass counts as recordable sales too. I fail to see your point - but that is quite okay in this instance also.
 
Quote from Pabst:

Anyone stupid enough to actually believe this shit couldn't stay alive trading for a living more than a week.
Ahem. I believe the <i>shit</i> and yet, I haven't had one loosing trade so far this year. My posts contain sufficient details to demonstrate it's the case, and generally speaking a double-digit return is a bad year for me. Another thing one might notice from my posts that contain a lot of comments about monetary policy is that I have a lot of respect for our institutions.
 
Come to think of it (and to beat the chit out of this dead horse),
Who is to say the sponsior(s) may be " stupid enough to actually believe this shit". ??

Now it is the well intended Moderator whom has offended the proverbal golden ET geese.

A respeced friend at dinner last night brought up the fact that space Lab junk and Space Shuttle debris - after being super heated during reentry into the atmosphere - still produced large retrieviabe um, "evidence" if you will?

Maybe that type of re-entry stuff is simply too fast for the BallChinnians ( as seen in the movie Men In Black II ) to aim their vapor-ray on?


QUOTE]Quote from Pabst:

Anyone stupid enough to actually believe this shit couldn't stay alive trading for a living more than a week. Sponsors on this site tend to be brokerages and trading related venders. [/QUOTE]
 
Back
Top