Finally - an intelligent environmental regulator

Dr. Donald van der Vaart should be placed in a national environmental position. Finally we have a regulator with some common sense.

What do liberal papers call this in front page articles? - "polarizing"

NC’s new environmental regulator is polarizing figure
  • Van der Vaart touts nuclear energy, is skeptical of renewables
  • Supporters laud his focus on economic aspects of regulation
  • Critics say secretary is overstepping his bounds with his statements
http://www.newsobserver.com/news/business/article42125817.html

Donald van der Vaart is the state’s first environmental director to come from within the state agency he is now running. A career middle manager, van der Vaart was plucked out of obscurity in January and put in charge of his former bosses.

In his short tenure as Secretary of the N.C. Department of Environmental Quality, the engineer with a law degree has wasted no time in promoting his conservative brand of environmentalism.

Within two weeks of taking the top job at the state’s environmental agency, van der Vaart jettisoned a pair of Republican deputies, including a former state legislator.

In recent weeks van der Vaart has been stumping for nuclear energy, even though the agency he oversees has little say in which power plants are built in North Carolina. And he frequently expresses doubts about the environmental benefits of wind and solar farms.

He is now spoiling for a court fight with the Environmental Protection Agency over greenhouse gas regulations that van der Vaart has denounced as a federal “takeover of our electricity system.”

Van der Vaart says his philosophy is straightforward: balancing environmentalism and economics.

“What it really is protecting the environment while we keep energy affordable,” van der Vaart said during a recent interview. “Because energy prices are absolutely fundamental for developing good paying jobs and as a weapon against poverty
.

(More at above url)
 
gwb, liberals don't care about smart regulation. Liberals care about narratives. If it doesn't fit the accepted narrative, everything else is irrelevant.
 
Sounds like you've got quite a narrative going there...

Actually, it's more of an observation. A narrative requires a little more story. But you can call it whatever you like. As GWB says, there are plenty of narratives out there that are far, far more dangerous than my observation.
 
Because energy prices are absolutely fundamental for developing good paying jobs and as a weapon against poverty.
Ah, the slump in energy prices explains the surge in employment lately. I can't wait to give the company the good news!
: )
 
Ah, the slump in energy prices explains the surge in employment lately. I can't wait to give the company the good news!
: )

Or you can take it that people can afford to pay their heating and electric bills when energy prices are low.
 
Or you can take it that people can afford to pay their heating and electric bills when energy prices are low.
These are running jokes around here: as natural gas falls it will be cheaper to heat the homes we'll soon be confined to. And falling oil/gasoline prices make it cheaper to drive to the unemployment office.
: )
 
These are running jokes around here: as natural gas falls it will be cheaper to heat the homes we'll soon be confined to. And falling oil/gasoline prices make it cheaper to drive to the unemployment office.
: )

Yes.... I know. :)

We can ask a few folks in Alberta what they think of lower oil prices.
 
Back
Top