Final tweet of terrorist shot in Capital

BeautifulStranger said:
The above definition includes Antifa, those politicians that supported Antifa, the media whose coverage amounted to incitement to riot, and Nancy Pelosi who said the riots will continue until certain behaviors by the Right are changed.

Let us compare the quality of Trump supporters either who got shot by the police, got shot by a a Leftist protester, or who shot another protester in self defense with Leftist supporters who got shot by police or Right supporters as well as Leftists who support those shot by police.

All the Trump supporters, as far as I know, involving in some way in a relatively recent shooting are upstanding and employed citizens. Most of the Leftist supports or those shot that are supported by Leftists are career criminals.

All unnecessary loss of life is tragic. When it comes down to contribution to our society, some losses are more tragic than others.

The media will of course try to cling to their narrative that Trump supporters were attempting to commit an unarmed insurrection and overthrow of the Government, but it is a tough sell. Especially when trying to impeach one our best citizens, mother and veteran Ashli Babbitt.

There is a saying that water seeks it’s own level.

What’s yours?
More...

We finally agree. The police in America are a HUGE problem.
 
BeautifulStranger said:
Below is a new video showing Ashli getting shot. Note there were Capitol police behind her, shown almost immediately after she was shot. Ashli was 35 years old, mother of one, unarmed, and a 14 year US Air Force veteran who served four tours. In other words, she was a warrior against terrorists.

View attachment 248355

View attachment 248356

picture-5.jpg

BY TYLER DURDEN
THURSDAY, JAN 07, 2021 - 3:29


"A woman was fatally shot inside the U.S. Capitol after the mob breached the building. The circumstances were not clear," The Washington Postbegins in its report on the Wednesday afternoon shooting of 35-year old Ashli Babbitt. She later died of the gunshot wound at a local hospital.

The circumstances have now become much clearer with video of the shooter emerging overnight. There were police behind her - indicating they did not consider her an immediate lethal threat - at the moment she attempted to breach a barricade inside the capitol building.

Despite the security officers behind her being potentially in the line of fire, Babbitt was still shot by a Capitol police officer as she attempted to jump over a physical barrier, new video shows.

The shooter was an unidentified law enforcement officer on the other side of the barricade who was preparing to prevent any breach of the high secure federal building, which has been confirmed in FOX5-D.C. reporting.

"D.C. Police Chief Robert Contee confirmed late Wednesday that Babbit was shot by a Capitol police officer. An internal investigation is now underway," FOX5 reports.

Ashli Babbitt was a San Diego native and high ranking military veteran: “The woman is Ashli Babbitt, a 14-year veteran, who served four tours with the US Air Force and was a high level security official throughout her time in service,” San Diego TV station KUSI reported.

“She was a strong supporter of President Trump,” the report added, citing her husband.

Here's video showing that at the very moment Babbitt was shot with her hands below her waist as she was climbing through a broken window, also clearly posing no threat to officers as she didn't brandish a weapon, and all the while there were actually Capitol police and security officers crouching immediately behind her:


https://www.zerohedge.com/political/exact-moment-ashli-babbitt-was-shot-while-storming-capitol?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:+zerohedge/feed+(zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline,+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero)
More...
What the fuck were these people thinking? So sad to see her shot but what do you expect. Clearly she could see an armed man right in front her tell her to stand back. From the police officers perspective, if the first person through the window is not taken out, everyone will be piling through further escalating the capital breach.
 
johnnyrock said:
We finally agree. The police in America are a HUGE problem.
More...

Actually, I would characterize some police members of our police force as having problems, not that police in America are a huge problem. It is my understanding that reforms concerning police conduct have been enacted since George Floyd.

Hey, it’s your guy’s call. You control the Presidency, the House, and the Senate.

Odds are, Radical Leftists are going to demand funding for a special, partisan police force, perhaps made up partially by Antifa members and South American “Immigrants”.

Counting the multiple generations of Trump supporting policemen and Military, it could make for some interesting times should the Radical Left step on too many toes. In case of conflict, I can well imagine Radical Leftist leadership being one of the first goodbyes. With modern technology, there really is no such thing as walls anymore.

Hopefully Biden and other senior Democrat leaders will be a moderating influence on the Radical Left so a potentially catastrophic purge affecting both sides can be avoided.
 
fan27 said:
What the fuck were these people thinking? So sad to see her shot but what do you expect. Clearly she could see an armed man right in front her tell her to stand back. From the police officers perspective, if the first person through the window is not taken out, everyone will be piling through further escalating the capital breach.
More...

My guess is she did not realize the danger she was in. She was not wearing a vest or was armed. Maybe a warning shot would have changed her attitude pronto haste. However, where could the officer have safely placed the warning shot? As it is, verbal warnings are often used before an officer fires his weapon against a unarmed person. The officer in question was behind a well barricaded door and was not alone.
 
BeautifulStranger said:
My guess is she did not realize the danger she was in. She was not wearing a vest or was armed. Maybe a warning shot would have changed her attitude pronto haste. However, where could the officer have safely placed the warning shot? As it is, verbal warnings are often used before an officer fires his weapon against a unarmed person. The officer in question was behind a well barricaded door and was not alone.
More...

as they were trespassing on government property during a government session, the officers had the right to shoot to kill.

maybe the officers didn’t realize that they were let in by complicit officers at the entrance.

but we learned from the Blue Lives Matter movement that police officers are justified in shooting innocent civilians as their safety is more important. (Unless their head is in a doorway that’s blocking you or you have a fire extinguisher you can throw on their head).
 
BeautifulStranger said:
My guess is she did not realize the danger she was in. She was not wearing a vest or was armed. Maybe a warning shot would have changed her attitude pronto haste. However, where could the officer have safely placed the warning shot? As it is, verbal warnings are often used before an officer fires his weapon against a unarmed person. The officer in question was behind a well barricaded door and was not alone.
More...

She breached the barricades, so they too wouldn't hold for too long. That shot might've been the last stand between the mob and a bloodbath.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top