Of course not, let's not be ridiculous. Batista's "crimes" were more in the nature of legal stealing, with U.S. blessings, and quietly, one assumes silencers were used, liquidating or locking up those who refused to look the other way. Castro's folks lined up and shot folks who opposed his revolution, as in any revolution; just as Washington lined up and ordered continental army soldiers to shoot their continental soldier friends who weren't behaving, or be shot themselves. Neither Washington, Batista nor Castro were cream puffs, though in the end Batista proved to be a coward. Revolutions make people do things they ordinarily wouldn't..
We are a eusocial species. We are happy to lay down our lives when our safe and sound leaders tell us it is for the good of the colony. The colony recognizes us as heroes rather than the fools we often were. When we don't follow the leader, we sometimes get shot, or worse!
____________________
Let us not lose sight of the difference between most revolutions and organized State wars. In revolutions, their are often leaders who put their own lives in great peril in acts of unaccountable bravery. The nature of revolutions is that the oppressed are standing up against those who have both resources and power. This is typically a very dangerous situation for the leaders of the revolution. The Cuban revolution was not characteristic, however, because when the leader Batista recognized that the opposition was serious, he got on a plane and left. It was relatively speaking a bloodless revolution up to that point. Later, when the Castro government began to seize property of the Capital class, is when the real trouble started.
