There is a lot of drama about raising the debt ceiling and the time is quickly running out before at least a partial or transitory default will happen. The nearest month Intrade contract is showing 34% chance of raising the debt ceiling to $15.1T or more before midnight, July 31. This is down from over 50% chance a couple weeks ago, and near the contract lows of around 25%. The similar contract for August 31 shows 66% chance, down from almost 80% a couple weeks ago. I don't bet on Intrade but I do prefer it to polling data for assessing probabilities of political events. As a rule of thumb, the narrower the bid/ask spread on contracts like this, the more credibility I attribute to the odds it implies. In this case the spread is wide
I wanted to discuss the implications of a default on the price of silver because I have a lot of silver exposure. Last week I sold $5,500 of AGNC shares and rolled the proceeds into AGQ, so here is an explanation.
AGNC is a mortgage reit that exclusively holds agency guaranteed mortgages. I had been accumulating AGNC slowly for months as a play on the wide yield curve. AGNC's business model is to borrow short and lend long, and do it on leverage as a carry trade. There are three main weaknesses to their business model that I watch closely:
1) Rising short term yields force them to shrink their mortgage portfolio
2) The shortfall in mortgage payment income must be serviced by submitting claims to the government agencies that guarantee the mortgage: can they pay it?
3) The value as collateral of agency paper (this is closely tied to the previous point)
The first weakness doesn't concern me at this time. The fed has monetary policy as loose as possible and trying to find ways to loosen further. I place a VERY low probability on short rates rising substantially in the near future. The same is not true of long term interest rates, and I am skeptical that there will be a lot of agency mortgages issued at the new higher rates, especially if it is a dramatic rise. In other words, I don't see how any of the mortgage reits can scale their profitability during a blowout of the yield curve to historic steepness. In my view AGNC is a play on a steep yield curve, but not on an unsustainable yield curve that has no resemblance to anything normal, which is what will happen if treasuries start into a spiral of downgrades and missed payments.
I should note that I still have something like $4,500 of AGNC.
So why did I choose to roll the proceeds into AGQ? Interestingly AGNC is probably the largest dividend yield in the stock market right now, and AGQ is a 2x levered silver etf (derivative) with no yield.
I realize that the view I'm about to express is probably not widely held by the market. The common thinking is probably that no increase in the debt ceiling means no increase in the money supply that eventually bids up commodities. While that is certainly a factor, I think there will be a bigger factor in the near future, and it has to do with AGNC risk #3 from above. The dollar used to be redeemable in specie, meaning it was exchangeable for physical precious metals. This hasn't been the case in decades, so it must be something else that explains the dollar's value besides "tradition"

That important ingredient is it's collateral value. As the world reserve currency, the dollar is the dominant collateral all over the world and the world's central banks have capitalized themselves with it.
Without going into a huge explanation, it is my view that we don't need to experience a debt ceiling increase and further expansions in the money supply to suffer a dollar devaluation. By devaluation I mean that our currency becomes less competitive in the global marketplace for commodities. Without even creating more dollars, they can be worth less than at present simply because people become less willing to hold them as collateral, and this will happen if we miss payments or are downgraded. Just because it is the US government that is the counter-party doesn't mean there is no counter-party risk, but this realization will be a difficult adjustment for most people.
Gold and silver make perfect collateral because there is no counter-party risk for the institution that holds it. I want to end this journal entry with an anecdotal story that should illustrate how far things need to correct. A friend of mine has a heavy safe deposit box at a bank, which he adds to regularly. The banker hates taking down his box it is so heavy. One day he said to his banker, "I have a lot of silver in my safety deposit box right here in your bank. Someday I might want to take out a loan. Can we arrange it so that you can make me a loan against this silver, which will remain right here in your vault?" The banker's response: "Sorry, we're not set up for that."