For many years I'd disregarded Fibs believing they were nonsense.
Well lately I've noticed some strange price action behaviour which had me wondering if traders using Fibs were behind the moves and my initial suspicion seems to confirm it as these moves seem to coincide with Fib numbers, I've knocked up a spreadsheet and doing my own testing.
I was reading up in Investopedia about it and it explains how the ratios etc are contrived.
It appears the main ratios traders use are: 61.80% 38.20% 23.61%.
They also say 50% is not a Fib ratio.
I created a table of numbers as below.
The ratios are constructed by dividing for example 13/8, 13/5, 13/3, 13/2, 13/1 etc.
I noticed that near the top of the table 50% is a Fib number.
What also noticed is near the top of the table the ratios change from those further down.
Eg row 20-34 in the first column is 61.80% but rows 9-19 there are different % ratios.
Question: are numbers like 7.69%, 9.52%, 8.82%...etc Fib numbers but not recognized as such?
Also I'm intrigued when they say 50% is not a Fib number but it appears so in the table?
Maybe what they mean, is 50% etc are not predominant repeating Fib numbers, would that be the correct interpretation?
Well lately I've noticed some strange price action behaviour which had me wondering if traders using Fibs were behind the moves and my initial suspicion seems to confirm it as these moves seem to coincide with Fib numbers, I've knocked up a spreadsheet and doing my own testing.
I was reading up in Investopedia about it and it explains how the ratios etc are contrived.
It appears the main ratios traders use are: 61.80% 38.20% 23.61%.
They also say 50% is not a Fib ratio.
I created a table of numbers as below.
The ratios are constructed by dividing for example 13/8, 13/5, 13/3, 13/2, 13/1 etc.
I noticed that near the top of the table 50% is a Fib number.
What also noticed is near the top of the table the ratios change from those further down.
Eg row 20-34 in the first column is 61.80% but rows 9-19 there are different % ratios.
Question: are numbers like 7.69%, 9.52%, 8.82%...etc Fib numbers but not recognized as such?
Also I'm intrigued when they say 50% is not a Fib number but it appears so in the table?
Maybe what they mean, is 50% etc are not predominant repeating Fib numbers, would that be the correct interpretation?

