M Money Trust Aug 26, 2014 #31 Ricter said: 2011 "black" on "black" homicide: 2,447 2011 "black" on "white" homicide: 448 2011 "white" on "white" homicide: 2,630 2011 "white" on "black" homicide: 193 http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/uc...s.-2011/tables/expanded-homicide-data-table-6 More... Whites outnumber blacks by several times so of course them killing each other would outnumber black on black homicides in plain numbers.
Ricter said: 2011 "black" on "black" homicide: 2,447 2011 "black" on "white" homicide: 448 2011 "white" on "white" homicide: 2,630 2011 "white" on "black" homicide: 193 http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/uc...s.-2011/tables/expanded-homicide-data-table-6 More... Whites outnumber blacks by several times so of course them killing each other would outnumber black on black homicides in plain numbers.
M Money Trust Aug 26, 2014 #32 Tsing Tao said: There is under reporting on all crimes. But if the statistics show that most crime where the victim is black happens to be from a black assailant, then the under reported crimes against black are predominantly caused by blacks. You can extrapolate. More... Thanks to the "no snitching" rule.
Tsing Tao said: There is under reporting on all crimes. But if the statistics show that most crime where the victim is black happens to be from a black assailant, then the under reported crimes against black are predominantly caused by blacks. You can extrapolate. More... Thanks to the "no snitching" rule.
