Fed's predictions? Hawkish or Dovish?

[Overnight]

...
Hey there's an ideal for a hedge fund. It's based off the trades made by US congressmen.

Funny, but the chart seems to be biased. Every column after the households should match the same household timeframes. Otherwise it is not a true objective study.

I.E...The average household from 1991-1996 lost, but US senators from 1993-1998 won. So what did households do from 1993-1998? What did US senators do from 1991-1996?

Etc etc...

 

[JSOP]

Funny, but the chart seems to be biased. Every column after the households should match the same household timeframes. Otherwise it is not a true objective study.

I.E...The average household from 1991-1996 lost, but US senators from 1993-1998 won. So what did households do from 1993-1998? What did US senators do from 1991-1996?

Etc etc...

Even so, now you know why people sleep with politicians and marry senators.

 

[JSOP]

*snort..huh, wah? Sorry, I was sleeping. I'm pretty sure Powell is going to go dovish today, market will like it.

Let me go back to my big bank employer as an analyst and tell you why I was right in retrospect, after the fact.*

You know, I get paid $300,000 a year to say why I knew I was right 4,000 years ago. I KNEW this was going to happen! Here, let me show you the charts WHY I was right, now that the markets have drawn them. I, like every other analyst at a big bank, is a GENIUS, and KNOW what the market is going to do. I never said when, just that it would!

Tomorrow morning, there is a 50-50 chance you are going to stub your toe. No matter what happens, I will never be wrong! AHAH! Next check please!

And for the record, I said it before it happened without playing both sides and I have no ties to any politicians or economists or anybody.

He probably wants to continue to be hawkish and he really should be but he would be forced to at least sound a bit dovish, thanks to Trump's trade policy now impacting the markets a bit.

 

[Overnight]

...without playing both sides and I have no ties to any politicians or economists or anybody.

Did you at least play with your minkey?

 

[Cuddles]

Funny, but the chart seems to be biased. Every column after the households should match the same household timeframes. Otherwise it is not a true objective study.

I.E...The average household from 1991-1996 lost, but US senators from 1993-1998 won. So what did households do from 1993-1998? What did US senators do from 1991-1996?

Etc etc...

yeah i noticed it too

 

[murray t turtle]

That's legally protected s...-jerks to you!

https://www.investmentu.com/article/detail/55695/why-congressional-insider-trading-legal-profitable

Hey there's an ideal for a hedge fund. It's based off the trades made by US congressmen.

Jim Rogers was right; look how badly corp insiders did.Its like one was quoted in WSJ; co went bankrupt but he did not want to sell- afraid it would send the wrong signal to investors !!