The FED supposedly only owns 10% of the govts debt.
However, this does not mean that the situation is not corrupt since the fed was undoubtedly in cahoots with other large private banks early in the 20th century who own the remaining 90%.
The whole debt situation is blown out of proportion however. Although debt has risen sharply over the last hundred years, the gdp has risen even faster! So the debt as a % of gdp has actually gotten smaller.
This % was lowest in around 1980 but has since rocketed upwards again.
Hence my comments early about taking the banking debt problems in context with economic growth.
If the US debt was zero right now our economy would not be anywhere near as large, since money would be much harder to come by for businesses to get started and expand, through loans etc.
Which is a better situation? 9 trillion in debt and 13 trillion GDP, or lets say 0 debt and 1 trillion GDP(for example)?
I am not an expert economist so i dont want to really talk about this, but i am sure it is highly subjective...
However, this does not mean that the situation is not corrupt since the fed was undoubtedly in cahoots with other large private banks early in the 20th century who own the remaining 90%.
The whole debt situation is blown out of proportion however. Although debt has risen sharply over the last hundred years, the gdp has risen even faster! So the debt as a % of gdp has actually gotten smaller.
This % was lowest in around 1980 but has since rocketed upwards again.
Hence my comments early about taking the banking debt problems in context with economic growth.
If the US debt was zero right now our economy would not be anywhere near as large, since money would be much harder to come by for businesses to get started and expand, through loans etc.
Which is a better situation? 9 trillion in debt and 13 trillion GDP, or lets say 0 debt and 1 trillion GDP(for example)?
I am not an expert economist so i dont want to really talk about this, but i am sure it is highly subjective...