Quote from piezoe:
I wanted to comment on a related issue. We have heard the Fed's creation of new money via the QE programs referred to as "printing". In a formal hearing Bernanke was asked indirectly if he was "printing" money. He said :"We are not printing", and he left it at that. I think confusion arises because technically to most economists "printing" means just that, i.e. creating money out of thin air and using it to pay on debt. (Exactly what Zimbabwe did!) However the U.S. is not "printing" in that sense. Each new dollar created via QE is attached to new debt. So in effect the U.S. is borrowing, not printing. I think now, Bernanke's answer was correct, though I was puzzled by it at the time.
I still hear the term "printing" used. I heard it yesterday morning on NPR. I think it is, in most cases, from the economists viewpoint, being used incorrectly.
Ok....they don't print physical money. They enter it into accounts via computer, basically expanding the money supply is a simple as typing in digit into a computer.
So, while Ben Bernake wasn't lying about actually running currency material through a press and printing it, he wasn't really answering the meaning of the question.
How does money get wired from your trading account to your bank account? It's a simple entry of digits into a computer system.
How long have you guys been in thecomputer age? almost 30 years probably? And you are completely fooled by this incompetent questioning?
I would be amazed if any of you that miss things like this make any money trading. I am not surprised but come on, think a little. Nobody is just going to hand you answers that are straightforward and simple, you really have to questions everything if you want to seek the facts.
See, the powerful can answer the letter of a question truthfully, so technically they are not lying. You also have to observe the questioner, they should have asked a more pertinent, meaningful question that was direct.
See...the hearings, elections et al are all a game. The game is to fool the public into thinking there is really a 1. discord between democrats and republicans 2. that some members of congress actually give a shit about the average working people 3. and that inquiries like senate hearings actually force the answers that would actually inform the populace.
Greenspan once said it makes no difference what the politicians think (paraphrase) the FEd will do what it wants to as it has always done.
There is really no point in trying to see if any of these FEd officials with do things honestly and in theinterests of the people at large: They have NEVER demonstrated that consistently. So why does anyone sort of wait and hope that maybe THIS fed chairman will be different, guess what, They will not be.
If the cabal that decides who the next FED chairman will be has any inkling that their man will do anything other that what fits their financial interests, they would never put him in that position in the first place.
In sort of a related thought, why do you think any trader who makes it HUGE gets targeted by the SEC, FBI, treasury? Do you think that the old boys' club of the New York FED (the only decision maker in the fed group of regional banks) wants to see some guy like Stephen Cohen take more and more of the money? I think not.
I have some inside info. My boyhood best friend is still one of SAC's top guys, he might be second or third in command. Now I don't know what the truth is, and it's true good men can be corrupted. But I question the fact of SAC's matter of insider trading, only because I know one of their guys so well. Sure we went different directions, but if ANYONE had the ability to be a top trader, who worked physically and mentally harder than ANYONE ive ever known, seen, heard about, read about and hung out with, it's my friend who killed it at everywhere he went including SAC.
The shitty thing is, because I trade, its now very difficult to even communicate with my friend. It has sucked for about 2 years. This guy is a genius that develop genius from working harder and believing harder than anyone I have ever met, including myself. I know what the media says, but the mass media has proven itself to be a lying and spin machine from the days of Edward Bernays (google or youtube him if you don't know who that is).
I am developing the theorem that basically the government, tied by the balls by the cabals like the fed owners, absolutely HATE if any other entity starts developing a way to take a larger piece of pie. That is to say if they take anything larger than what the cabal feels is "enough" for the outsiders.