Federal Employees Get Compensated WAY MORE Than The Rest Of Us

Hey Twat face, Ever read the Nathan Braden Biography or anything that had to do with Red's and White's?

Quote from phenomena:

LOL!! And of course the interjection from the village know-it-all who tried to argue that trotsky was not a commie/socialist... and yeah, he was actually serious... LOL!!!
 
No I was very clear when I said you should make your piece. I was very clear you should make it now.

Quote from phenomena:

LOL!!! LOL!!! LOL!!!! I think he meant "peace". Stupid motherfucker uses the wrong word and then even spells the wrong word incorrectly!!! LOL!!! This might even top the "Trotsky wasn't a socialist" incident!! ROFLMAO!!! This fucking retard... OMG! What a failure of evolution... LOL!! This is what keeps me coming back.. you can't buy this kind of entertainment!!! LOL!!!
 
LOL!!! Now he's acting like he can actually read!! ROFLMAO!!! All from the guy telling you that the "Leader of the Red Army" and head of the Russian Social Democratic Labour Party, famous socialist Leon Trotsky, was in fact NOT a socialist!! ROFLMAO!!!!


Quote from Dr. Zhivodka:

Hey Twat face, Ever read the Nathan Braden Biography or anything that had to do with Red's and White's?
 
LOL!!! WTF are you even talking about?? Okay corky, what do you want me to "make my piece" of??

Quote from Dr. Zhivodka:

No I was very clear when I said you should make your piece. I was very clear you should make it now.
 
What a chump.. you have no clue of what you try to speak.


Quote from phenomena:

LOL!!! Now he's acting like he can actually read!! ROFLMAO!!! All from the guy telling you that the "Leader of the Red Army" and head of the Russian Social Democratic Labour Party, famous socialist Leon Trotsky, was in fact NOT a socialist!! ROFLMAO!!!!
 
I fail to see what's so laughable about a claim that x was not actually a y, when the definition of y is debatable. This is what historians and philosophers do, all scholars, really... ?

Edit: and I'm not aware of that book, or any argument about Trotsky. I'm just saying...
 
LOL!!! You can't be serious... of course one socialist comes in to stroke the other's cock... LOL!!! You can split hairs all day over what a socialist/communist is or is not but trying to debate that one of the most prominent and influential marxist and socialist thinkers, a patriarch of socialism, is NOT a socialist is just down right fucking stupid. It's on par with saying that hitler was not a racist. As much as you guys want to stroke each other's cocks and try to water dr's stupidity down with arcane abstractions, there's no wiggling out of this one. Sorry, maybe next time... LOL!!!

Quote from Ricter:

I fail to see what's so laughable about a claim that x was not actually a y, when the definition of y is debatable. This is what historians and philosophers do, all scholars, really... ?

Edit: and I'm not aware of that book, or any argument about Trotsky. I'm just saying...
 
He's just being a little puck. We could probably agree if he weren't such a little one.

Quote from Ricter:

I fail to see what's so laughable about a claim that x was not actually a y, when the definition of y is debatable. This is what historians and philosophers do, all scholars, really... ?

Edit: and I'm not aware of that book, or any argument about Trotsky. I'm just saying...
 
Back
Top