all of that is irrelevant. you are out of you depth on this.
spouting cliches with no thought should trouble you.
and its bullshit on you part...
considering your stance on sanctuary cites
and the fact that CA and Colorado and other states nullify congress made law when it comes to things like pot.
the main law of our land is the Constitution.
The branches and the states then fight it out.
spouting cliches with no thought should trouble you.
and its bullshit on you part...
considering your stance on sanctuary cites
and the fact that CA and Colorado and other states nullify congress made law when it comes to things like pot.
the main law of our land is the Constitution.
The branches and the states then fight it out.
1.The language of the law is clear
3.It might be.But the law has been in place since 1964 and until The SC rules that is the case the 1964 law is the law of the land
2 and 4.If it was really about security than Saudi Arabia would be #1 on the ban list since the people who killed 3,000 Americans were from Saudi Arabia