You keep stating that the Fed should be free from political influence, and you keep ignoring that the Fed is already influenced by both politicians AND the banks/financial institutions that own them. Just as is the SEC, the CFTC, and to a lesser extent, FINRA. The revolving door is disgusting.
Rand Paul does not want to dictate monetary policy to the Fed. That's your bullshit interpretation of the bill. It is a scare tactic that the shadowy institution uses on the media and the public in order to allow it to continue to operate unsupervised and hidden from the public eye.
On thing in your post above that deserves comment is your assertion, and others too have made the same absurd assertion, that the U.S. Federal Reserve is a "shadowy institution" and that it operates "hidden from the public."
The Federal Reserve is by law to operate as an independent agency of the government and while subject to extensive review and oversight it is isolated, by law, from congressional, or other political interference. One may object to Fed independence, though such a view must be held in a vacuum, because all historical evidence is to the contrary. (See note 1)
One may not however legitimately claim that the Fed is a "shadowy institution" that operates hidden from the public eye. Any such claim is absurd, and anyone making such a claim will immediately lose credibility in the eyes of any informed person. (see Note 2)
_____________________________
N.B.
the following notes have been copied directly From Governor Powells Speech (or related footnotes) at Catholic University on Fed 9, 2015.
#1 : The seminal research establishing a link between central bank independence and macroeconomic performance is Alberto Alesina and Lawrence H. Summers (1993), "
Central Bank Independence and Macroeconomic Performance: Some Comparative Evidence,"
Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, vol. 25 (May), pp. 151-62. More recent research finds the relationship to be less solid, however, in part because independent central banks have in several cases been instituted precisely because economic performance has been subpar; for example, see Christopher Crowe and Ellen E. Meade (2007), "
The Evolution of Central Bank Governance around the World,"
Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 21 (4), pp. 69-90; Christopher Crowe and Ellen E. Meade (2008), "
Central Bank Independence and Transparency: Evolution and Effectiveness,"
European Journal of Political Economy, vol. 24 (4), pp. 763-77; and N. Nergiz Dincer and Barry Eichengreen (2014), "
Central Bank Transparency and Independence: Updates and New Measures,"
International Journal of Central Banking, vol. 10 (1), pp. 189-259.
#2 : ...
the Fed does not set its own goals for monetary policy. Congress assign[ed] goals of price stability and maximum employment--that is, the highest level of employment achievable without threatening price stability. Federal Reserve Board members are nominated by the President and must be confirmed by the Senate. The Chair of the Fed appears before both the House and Senate oversight committees twice every year to report on monetary policy, and, in practice, to respond to questions about anything and everything related to the Fed's activities. The Chair and other Board members routinely make additional appearances before the Congress and meet frequently with members.
More generally, the Fed is open and transparent in its operations, including those related to monetary policy, accounting for itself in timely post-meeting FOMC statements, minutes, broadcast press conferences, and speeches. Details about the Fed's balance sheet are on the public record; in fact,
every security owned by the Fed is identified individually on the website of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. The FOMC's plans to normalize the balance sheet have been the subject of exhaustive discussion--in FOMC meetings, in speeches by policymakers, and among the many journalists and academics who analyze and discuss Fed policies. Last September, the FOMC published its Normalization Principles, which set forth its plans to reduce the balance sheet to a more normal level over time.
The Fed's financial statements are also a matter of public record, and are audited annually by independent, outside auditors under the watchful eye of the Fed's independent Inspector General. ... the Federal Reserve's financial statements, though they contain very large numbers, are relatively straightforward--much simpler than those of a typical regional bank.
The Fed's operations, including its role regulating and supervising banks, are subject to extensive review by the GAO.
If you visit the GAO's website, you'll find more than 70 reports since the crisis that are wholly or partly dedicated to reviewing the Fed's operations, including the emergency lending facilities ...
The GAO works closely with the Fed's Office of Inspector General, which is involved in both financial audits and other oversight of ... operations.
The extensive oversight ... intensified ...as the Federal Reserve responded to the financial crisis. .. lending facilities were also the subject of review by the Fed's Inspector General, the Special Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program, the Congressional Oversight Panel, the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission established by the Congress, and numerous congressional hearings and reviews.
The Fed's actions were also fully transparent. As always, monetary policy decisions were debated and voted on by the FOMC and announced immediately, with detailed explanations provided in the minutes of these deliberations.
The Fed provided public guidance on its plans to purchase assets and made those purchases in open, competitive transactions that were disclosed as soon as they occurred.
The terms and conditions for every lending facility were publicly disclosed. The amounts lent under each program were published on the Fed's weekly balance sheet report. The Fed created a website and issued a monthly report to the Congress disclosing details on all loans, such as the quantity and quality of collateral posted by borrowers.