FBI 'Would Go Ballistic' If Hillary Not Indicted
- Thread starter Scataphagos
- Start date
Hillary Clinton is a presidential candidate, with a lot history and as such is almost immune to any prosecution.
Don't you get it??
it'll never happen broheil
Trouble with the law? Call Saul. We can set you up with a presidential campaign, making you immune to prosecution.
please, you and wedodd place your trades here. i want to take other side of each and everyone, get rich
broheil
broheil
Report: FBI Has Enough Evidence to Prosecute Hillary Clinton for Public Corruption
Morry Gash/AP
by JOHN SEXTON11 Jan 20162,355
An investigation into possible mishandling of classified information on Hillary Clinton’s private email server has expanded to consider whether Clinton’s work as Secretary overlapped with her work for the Clinton Foundation run by her family.
Fox News‘ Catherine Herridge published the report, citing unnamed FBI sources, Monday morning. The report indicates the initial security referral looking into whether or not classified information was mishandled has expanded to look at possible public corruption involving the Clinton Foundation.
The report paints a picture of an internal struggle within the FBI over whether or not to prosecute Clinton. Herridge quotes an unnamed FBI source saying, “many previous public corruption cases have been made and successfully prosecuted with much less evidence than what is emerging in this investigation.”
One parallel said to be weighing on the FBI is the prosecution of David Petraeus. Petraeus pled guilty to a misdemeanor for sharing highly classified information with his biographer and lover Paula Broadwell and also for lying to the FBI. A two-year investigation concluded that none of the classified information ever appeared in Broadwell’s book. Nevertheless, Petraeus’s treatment was considered a slap on the wrist by some agents within the FBI.
As many as 100 special agents are said to be working on the investigation, including about 50 assigned to work the case on a temporary basis. Herridge reports the agents have been asked to sign new non-disclosure agreements, possibly to prevent leaks or because of the classified information being handled in the examination of Clinton’s server.
Over 1,300 documents on Clinton’s server have been deemed classified thus far, with more to come as the State Department continues to release new emails each month. Two of the emails have been judged to have contained “top secret” material at the time they were sent. The State Department initially suggested the information in those emails may have come from a parallel intelligence source but, apparently, dropped that claim. The Department then asked for a review of those classifications in an attempt to have them downgraded, but a final determination by the Director of National Intelligence found the emails did contain “top secret” information at the time they were sent.
Clinton’s former IT person, Bryan Pagliano, chose to plead the 5th rather than answer questions about his involvement with Clinton’s unique email arrangement.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...fbi-investigation-of-hillary-clinton-expands/
Morry Gash/AP
by JOHN SEXTON11 Jan 20162,355
An investigation into possible mishandling of classified information on Hillary Clinton’s private email server has expanded to consider whether Clinton’s work as Secretary overlapped with her work for the Clinton Foundation run by her family.
Fox News‘ Catherine Herridge published the report, citing unnamed FBI sources, Monday morning. The report indicates the initial security referral looking into whether or not classified information was mishandled has expanded to look at possible public corruption involving the Clinton Foundation.
The report paints a picture of an internal struggle within the FBI over whether or not to prosecute Clinton. Herridge quotes an unnamed FBI source saying, “many previous public corruption cases have been made and successfully prosecuted with much less evidence than what is emerging in this investigation.”
One parallel said to be weighing on the FBI is the prosecution of David Petraeus. Petraeus pled guilty to a misdemeanor for sharing highly classified information with his biographer and lover Paula Broadwell and also for lying to the FBI. A two-year investigation concluded that none of the classified information ever appeared in Broadwell’s book. Nevertheless, Petraeus’s treatment was considered a slap on the wrist by some agents within the FBI.
As many as 100 special agents are said to be working on the investigation, including about 50 assigned to work the case on a temporary basis. Herridge reports the agents have been asked to sign new non-disclosure agreements, possibly to prevent leaks or because of the classified information being handled in the examination of Clinton’s server.
Over 1,300 documents on Clinton’s server have been deemed classified thus far, with more to come as the State Department continues to release new emails each month. Two of the emails have been judged to have contained “top secret” material at the time they were sent. The State Department initially suggested the information in those emails may have come from a parallel intelligence source but, apparently, dropped that claim. The Department then asked for a review of those classifications in an attempt to have them downgraded, but a final determination by the Director of National Intelligence found the emails did contain “top secret” information at the time they were sent.
Clinton’s former IT person, Bryan Pagliano, chose to plead the 5th rather than answer questions about his involvement with Clinton’s unique email arrangement.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...fbi-investigation-of-hillary-clinton-expands/
Petraeus was collateral damageReport: FBI Has Enough Evidence to Prosecute Hillary Clinton for Public Corruption
Morry Gash/AP
by JOHN SEXTON11 Jan 20162,355
An investigation into possible mishandling of classified information on Hillary Clinton’s private email server has expanded to consider whether Clinton’s work as Secretary overlapped with her work for the Clinton Foundation run by her family.
Fox News‘ Catherine Herridge published the report, citing unnamed FBI sources, Monday morning. The report indicates the initial security referral looking into whether or not classified information was mishandled has expanded to look at possible public corruption involving the Clinton Foundation.
The report paints a picture of an internal struggle within the FBI over whether or not to prosecute Clinton. Herridge quotes an unnamed FBI source saying, “many previous public corruption cases have been made and successfully prosecuted with much less evidence than what is emerging in this investigation.”
One parallel said to be weighing on the FBI is the prosecution of David Petraeus. Petraeus pled guilty to a misdemeanor for sharing highly classified information with his biographer and lover Paula Broadwell and also for lying to the FBI. A two-year investigation concluded that none of the classified information ever appeared in Broadwell’s book. Nevertheless, Petraeus’s treatment was considered a slap on the wrist by some agents within the FBI.
As many as 100 special agents are said to be working on the investigation, including about 50 assigned to work the case on a temporary basis. Herridge reports the agents have been asked to sign new non-disclosure agreements, possibly to prevent leaks or because of the classified information being handled in the examination of Clinton’s server.
Over 1,300 documents on Clinton’s server have been deemed classified thus far, with more to come as the State Department continues to release new emails each month. Two of the emails have been judged to have contained “top secret” material at the time they were sent. The State Department initially suggested the information in those emails may have come from a parallel intelligence source but, apparently, dropped that claim. The Department then asked for a review of those classifications in an attempt to have them downgraded, but a final determination by the Director of National Intelligence found the emails did contain “top secret” information at the time they were sent.
Clinton’s former IT person, Bryan Pagliano, chose to plead the 5th rather than answer questions about his involvement with Clinton’s unique email arrangement.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...fbi-investigation-of-hillary-clinton-expands/
It aint gonna make a Hilary can of beans difference if it is her or one of the other bozos (other than Trump) the republicans are running to you and me. This FBI investigation is really the only real news. If they give her a pass because of who she is, well, that's really the end of it all isn't it? It's not like the free world will end if she is taken down. As a matter of fact, at this point the only thing that could ever make me vote was if Bernie made it, and then they would see this old TEA party right winger vote a straight democrat ticket. Otherwise, it is just shameful. It all starts with a wink and a nod and ends up like the mafia.
if you are a salesman for the democrat party you are doing a piss poor job. Everyone on this site can see right through you. You love your party more than you love truth or facts. And everytime you post it makes those of us that are indifferent to your dying party hate everything the democrat party stands for even more. Those sales tactics may work on your democrat sheep but they don't carry much weight with a right wing republican. If you want to convert an undecided to your side try to engage them with something more than "that's just the way the world is and there is nothing you can do about it." I know that's the democrat message, but it is starting to ring really hollow with anybody who actually cares. Your only hope, and the hope of your party is that eventually nobody will even care anymore and then finally you will have the power you crave.
Hey dude, you discredit yourself by statements like this. I did multiple trades in the EURUSD today (as I do every day). Sometimes I agree with your statements politically, other times I don't. Sometimes I'm on the same side of your trade, other times not. It doesn't matter to me . I'm not sure why you keep asking people in this part of the forum about their trades. Don't get pegged as a troll.
please, you and wedodd place your trades here. i want to take other side of each and everyone, get rich
broheil
Yeah, because you're certainly not going to get rich trading on your own.
