The Republicans about to pass higher taxes on states that voted Democrat.
FBI Plot uncovered - is this Prima Facie Treason?
- Thread starter jem
- Start date
The Republicans about to pass higher taxes on states that voted Democrat.
He should start hiring the best lawyers, he knows them after all.
His record on the big cases which he was personally involved in and where he put on a full show and full investigation and offered deals and immunities up the ying/yang is very dim and tepid.
On the daily caseload in the prosecutors office where you are cutting deals on the daily grind of cases then the numbers may be more wins than losses, as they are for even a law school intern working in the local prosecutors office. But in big cases where a full defense is put on, he is a marginal prosecutor and has seen much of his gains at trial reversed later on appeal.
Here is an article from a conservative site, the LA Times. He is marginal at best.
http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-mueller-record-20171122-story.html
What clear evidence of a fix being put in by the DOJ do you have?
Oh, no one doubts that you are in favor of investigating Trump.
In regard to other threats to the Republic from the intel agencies or political corruption from Camp Hillary including the DNC/Podesta/Dossier arenas, then.......not so much. You will make almost any argument of attempt that we should look somewhere else.
But then, you supported the side that had the insurance policy.
The same evidence being discussed by the House Committee and the Inspector General and publicly reported.
Play dumb as long as you can.
We know you can do it.
When you are doing that technical analysis you might want to check your Ichimoku Cloud too to see whether people are feeling bullish or bearish about Mueller's and the Swamp DOJ's clown show.
http://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/364873-mueller-fbi-face-crisis-in-public-confidence
Gregg Jarrett says Mueller's actions were illegal.
The corrupt Mueller team says they were legal.
The difference?
Jarrett sites the actual laws broken. Mueller's team blows hot air.
Gregg Jarrett: Mueller's allegedly lawless acts have corrupted his probe and demand his removal
http://googleweblight.com/?lite_url...555610&sig=AOyes_S7JBNZCqwQpwlGhj64k1VftrDQJg
The corrupt Mueller team says they were legal.
The difference?
Jarrett sites the actual laws broken. Mueller's team blows hot air.
Gregg Jarrett: Mueller's allegedly lawless acts have corrupted his probe and demand his removal
http://googleweblight.com/?lite_url...555610&sig=AOyes_S7JBNZCqwQpwlGhj64k1VftrDQJg
As corrupt as it gets. The emails were private and some of the them contain presidential privileged information.
They let Clinton get away with hiding her emails that she wasn't entitled to hide.
Now they grab Trump team emails in violation of the law.
Mueller's team not only needs to be canned, they need to have an investigation of them commenced by a new special counsel.
They let Clinton get away with hiding her emails that she wasn't entitled to hide.
Now they grab Trump team emails in violation of the law.
Mueller's team not only needs to be canned, they need to have an investigation of them commenced by a new special counsel.
You said there was evidence of a fix. What evidence?
Far as I know neither the house or the ig is investigating a fix.