FBI Plot uncovered - is this Prima Facie Treason?

LOL, Muellers team says they had the proper authorizations.

You mean like Mueller said he had evidence Steven Hatfill was the anthrax perp?

Mueller's word ain't good for shit and this is the cold hard proof. Anyone who thinks it is, is a moron.

US Settles for $5.8 Million With Scientist Accused In 2001 Anthrax Scare
talkingpointsmemo.com/.../img-src-http-talkingpointsmemo-com-images-anthrax-mu...
Jun 27, 2008 - Facing a massive lawsuit, the U.S. Justice Department is opting to give a $5.8 millionsettlement to Steven Hatfill
 
jem said:
so what?
many were dismissed on procedural grounds.

When it was time to provide proof... Obama choose to not show up in Georgia.
More...


He was on Georgia's state ballot so obviously Georgia had all they needed.
 
fhl said:
LOL, Muellers team says they had the proper authorizations.

You mean like Mueller said he had evidence Steven Hatfill was the anthrax perp?

Mueller's word ain't good for shit and this is the cold hard proof. Anyone who thinks it is, is a moron.

US Settles for $5.8 Million With Scientist Accused In 2001 Anthrax Scare
talkingpointsmemo.com/.../img-src-http-talkingpointsmemo-com-images-anthrax-mu...
Jun 27, 2008 - Facing a massive lawsuit, the U.S. Justice Department is opting to give a $5.8 millionsettlement to Steven Hatfill
More...


Mueller has far more wins than losses
 
fhl said:
LOL, Muellers team says they had the proper authorizations.

You mean like Mueller said he had evidence Steven Hatfill was the anthrax perp?

Mueller's word ain't good for shit and this is the cold hard proof. Anyone who thinks it is, is a moron.

US Settles for $5.8 Million With Scientist Accused In 2001 Anthrax Scare
talkingpointsmemo.com/.../img-src-http-talkingpointsmemo-com-images-anthrax-mu...
Jun 27, 2008 - Facing a massive lawsuit, the U.S. Justice Department is opting to give a $5.8 millionsettlement to Steven Hatfill
More...


Mueller has far more wins than losses
 
TreeFrogTrader said:
You can spin it any way you want.

But when there is clear evidence that the FBI/Justice Department took deliberate steps to 1) put the fix in for one candidate, and 2) conspire to keep the other candidate from ever being elected then I am 100% in favor of pursuing that relentlessly and ruthlessly. If Trump ultimately gets a couple limbs blown off and his wife and kids end out going to prison- based on real rather than phoney charges- then I still want to go there if that is price that has to be paid for looking at everything on all sides. And I would show the Justice Department and Camp Clinton no mercy either, and I would have the emails by the end of the months or Clapper would be in prison too.

You have made it clear that you are 100% in favor of just pursuing Trump. That is your definition of "pursuit of justice." We expect no less.
More...

There certainly is not “clear evidence” the DOJ, including the FBI, “put the fix in for one candidate” or conspired against another candidate. You are making that up.

I am all in favor of the DOJ, via of Mueller, investigating any connections the Trump campaign has to Russians interfering in our 2016 presidential election and undermining the fairness of it. If that should go to T ump himself, then so be it.
 
jem said:
While I agree most motions to exclude evidence fail.
The definitely do not always fail.

Cops generally follow a routine. Their reports are read over and "sanitized" to make it look like no consititution rights or laws were broken. A normal defendant has a very hard time overcoming this. Plus Judges tend to err on the side of govt when it comes to procedural issues because they know the govt has the resources to fight.

However, in this situation. The fruit of the poisonous tree arguments are likely to be litigated for years... all the way up to the Supreme Court. Mueller should have played this buy the book.
He has not... this is going to cost him... if putting Trump in jail was really the goal.

But...as far as bringing a motion to exclude evidence in court before the Prosecution presents his case.

now this is to Tony
1. even it it were possible to file prior to an complaint or indictment... it could be be mal practice to file motions to exclude without seeing what is being prosecuted. you would not want to burn motions to exclude without knowing which ones are your most important ones. In criminal law the timing of motions can be critical.
More...

How did Mueller not “play this by the book”?
 
Todd St
arnes: Was the FBI weaponized to take down the Trump presidency?
1509121118596.jpg

By Todd Starnes | Fox News


It appears the Obama Administration weaponized the Federal Bureau of Investigation just like they weaponized the Internal Revenue Service.

The Obama administration used government agencies to wage a covert war on their political enemies. This is an all-out war.

We have a growing mountain of evidence to suggest the FBI was attempting to overthrow a duly elected president. We have evidence to suggest the FBI was protecting Hillary Clinton so she might be elected president.

There is no smoking gun just yet – but the evidence is staggering – it is simply staggering.

Rep. Mike Johnson (R-LA) told the Todd Starnes Radio Show there are “very serious implications.”

Click here to watch the interview and continue reading at ToddStarnes.com.
 
UsualName said:
There certainly is not “clear evidence” the DOJ, including the FBI, “put the fix in for one candidate” or conspired against another candidate. You are making that up.
More...



No. Clear evidence on both counts.

Special prosecutor needed.

More to come.

Need to have Trump put some insurance policies of his own in place. Hope that works for you as well as it does when others do it.
 
UsualName said:
How did Mueller not “play this by the book”?
More...


Hired proven witch-hunters rather than unbiased investigators. Even he had to acknowledge that one had crossed the line to the extent that it jeopardized the investigation.

Mueller accepted position as independent prosecutor knowing that he could not be independent because his primary witness in the obstruction allegation was a personal friend, and he had been his mentor.

Deplorable.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top