Fatigue

Are you implying that Spydie took an unsanctioned trade? Horrors! Maybe he's been stealing MY stuff. I misplaced my waders. Save me the trouble and give me the Cliff's Notes version of the trade rationalization.
 
666, much as I love you (you ARE a girl, aren't you?), the trade was untuitive. You want the truth? Can you handle the truth? I drew an imaginary channel in my head and traded the break. For the lie version, see my new thread in Journals. Iterative Defilement.
 
Quote from Trader666:

Jack, please explain how a trade that is revealed after-the-fact can set anyone up (except the one who claims he made it). What are you trying to say?
More...

Spyder posted the series of comments (in one post as a listing) that trader28 was going to make before he (Trader 28) posted the photoshop comment.

In particular, the upcoming "photoshop" comment that was made by Trade 28 right after the print by Todd.

1....2.... 3... set up, print, Trader28 photoshop comment.

For some reason, you missed that trader 28 was already set up by Todd earlier in the day.

Don't worry about the stuff you don't understand or don't catch on to.

Let me give you a headache now that you have the above straight.

There is a picture being painted about how methodical trading turns out to be. It happens that the CW of the financial industry is not the better paradigm. Pool extraction is a concept that can be used to advance thinking about making money as a retail individual (amateur).

Look at the plateaux of science being applied to institutional opportunities. It was inevitable that the Strowager switch would be replaced by the crossbar five. Similarly the relay latch was replaced by the bi-stable multi vibrator using 12AU7's. Cores became threaded and current driven (5881's) using random access to eliminate crossover noise. Voltage analogs were replaces by current analogs in IT.

Now the trading logic has moves from one analog to another. This is the advent of using the null hypothesis for pool extraction to eliminate the induction modus of Cray’s applied to the old paradigm. Certainty has replaced probability.

Obviously the coding of certainty using the null hypothesis is precisely like applying a circuit like a latch current oriented logic to make logic multi use in a non stationary window. Just as it was inevitable that the 700's series IBM and equivalent mainframe computers would go "real" time (SABRE, for example) by substituting electronic data streams for tapes and cards, it is inevitable that probability would be replaced by certainty.

The key was the application of a circuit that created certainty level by level of drilling down symmetrically into data until the non stationary window became totally independent to becoming time sensitive. A null hypothesis certainty based circuit was the requirement for the sufficiency test to gate (and latch the more coarse part of the pat) and that drills down into the non time bound very sensitive feeds.

The two parts of trading logic are orthogonal and each can use the same null hypothesis certainty based circuit just as the Maxwell Equations apply equally well to the orthogonal electric and magnetic fields and yet very unlike instruments are required to measure the fields.

Jem explained the other day how a signal to trade successfully is very short in duration and a signal that trades unsuccessfully is apparent and there fore seemingly forever. He also acknowledged that the readers of his prior posts did not get it, either.

shifting from one paradigm to another so that money can be made all the time is a difficult concept and creating a counterintuitive logic is difficult to. But when a universal Building Block (BB) becomes available, then it can be used to frill level after level form coarse to medium to fine where the nonstationary window is also non time dependant for purposes of the null hypothesis being applied as a certainty test. Latching
each level of measure rakes it from the dynamic to a static frerence and this acts as the "sufficiency permission" to activate drilling deeper with the same certainty test capacity.

you could have seen from mandelbrotset's print that he had a very high money velocity but he used an induction based trimmer when he was obliged mentally (fear overrides confidence when non null hypothesis tests are used) and his net diminished consequently. The alternative, SCT used mechanically or as ATS logic circuitry, creates a positive feedback loop whereby mistakes only add small profits as a consequence of mistake recognition.

By not drilling down logically and only operating on coarser levels there is no netting effect but only less frequent trades as a consequence of the HOLD logic circuitry dominating for longer periods of time until the REVERSE logic circuitry steps in and rakes precedence and causes MADA to generate the second A just when the limiting case of the logic dictates change under the certainty of the null hypothesis.

Everyone in circuitry design and switching theory knows how series and parallel switching circuits work. The analogue circuitry of the Nike Ajax system had to be zero set 48 times a second to deal with signal drift BUT the solution achieved by intersecting two quadratic equations only have to by modified by a 25 cycle oscillation applied to the antenna rotary bearings to take mechanical lag effects out of the ignition command.

In trading the equivalent kinds of effects are present and the logic circuitry simply goes off a time based circuitry when carving the turns according to human psychology such as Jem pointed out yesterday.

Rcanfiel gets the shits when he thinks his system will be reverse engineered. He should since he is so simplistic and is only, for the first time, in many years getting an inckling of what the market offers.

Trading goes from 4 to 7 trades a day on the beginning level. Five levels deeper in the drilling there are 20 to 40 trades a day. The asymptote of performance is as I and orhers have stated.

The "switching" circuits (change signalers) always operate in parallel. All are engaged with perfect certainty. Most of the circuitry is shut down at the beginner level since it is not engaged by the criteria of "no permission was given" through the non latching non event occurring.

Money is made by knowing that you know and the topics are switch gating topics. The MODE and the SENTIMENT are what matter. For trading these things are determined during NOW which is a slot in time that has no time dimension. Fortunately, as has been well said, long before NOW it is known (knowing that you know) WMCN.

So I guess that makes the combo of latches and gates something called filters. A filter is just something that takes you logically, with certainty, to the right place at the right time.

Now you see why OODA (John Boyd) doesn't have certainty associated with it and why using finite sets in MADA does.
 
I’m really beginning to wonder whether JH is maybe actually a moderator on ET ???
Either that or some connection to the moderators.

The fact that all JH’s detractors get banned / censored often, while JH continues to feed controversy with apparent impunity.

...does make me wonder....:confused:
 
Quote from hypostomus:

Bravo, Jack! You managed to achieve turbidity and turgidity simultaneously!
More...

LOL Are you sure???

Everything does have gradient, divergence and curl, ya know....

It's hard to believe so many people haven't seen the markets for what they are systemically.

Just think of the expert trader sitting there with contracts running (50 to 100 anytime) and being unaffected (totally) by the other players as he extracts all that is offered....... turn after turn carving out the chips......it is sooo fucking funny to see what 20 to 40 turns a day accummulates compared to someone like Greenspoon being an OODA fighter pilot squeaking out less than a tic average on 24,000 contract turns a day (10,000 dollars from playing 400 cars at a time 60 times a day).

40 contracts doing 40k in one turn by an indiviual in a couple hour trend (coarse) is beyond the pale for Greenspoon or Steenbarger.

There was a time when there was little hardware and almost no commands (dated I know). APL only got serious by the time they had 360's back to back. That's when language could be put onto hardware but it took a long time to generate the hardware to have a need for language.

I can remember changing gears and cones on a GE differential analyzer. LOL we did step functions by turning motors on and off. Our Reeves analog had ten turn pots all over the 19 inch racks and you could always smell the lacquer aging on the coils.

The market is a machine that operates as a system: process is king and a structure emerges (Use Alexander's Method to segment the parts) to pour out the results from the huge pools.

Can you see the body that is flowing? Gradient, divergence and curl. Thats where the pace and capacity and the momentum come from (not in that hydraulic order...lol.... Do the funny maths. Is there anybody to talk to here???

This isn't the Army Corps of engineers squirting water on a sand Table. See the Mud Island design we did for the kiddies that visit Memphis. The arial tram goes over it.

The model is all there (in the markets to see) but it is not in a constant cross section pipe or open surface. Think about how to define the rate and size of partial fills to exceed the capacity....go for it.....

An individual amateur sits and plays...... all the money needed is there every monday after profits are swept for the stock hot list on Friday.... let your mouth water... see the preflight check either give you CO or not give you CO....synch comes rolling in.. the indexarb.com value is correct aftr all.......

turn on the drift calc .... fire up the pace level.......plug in the cars on the first command of the market.... the MODE is always CONTINUE at this moment.... we got the sendiment.... AND we have the next five trades noted.......

P&L it like looking at the altimeter spinning upward on the discovery at launch. Look at the three charts that tell you when the money velocity is going to cut back....... see when you have to begin to do partials after the extrordinary volume line is not reached by the PRV dot bouncing out there up to 5 minutes ahead.... how many WMCN are lined up on your log going down the page.....


10k....20k.....30k.....more coffee.... We might be going to see high volume soon coming down from extraordinary... how can we get a non dom traverse worked in here???? that T&S is showing 500 cars all over the place as our cars snuggle in there too


ETC...etc.... etc...

Oh yes there are the stock streams running too. You have all that surplus swept over to those streams of cap. your looking at the unusual volume kick off and you have some peaking where you have to do partials to get in and out just because the blocks are only runnng at 3,000 0or so. You need 50K shares......using 10% of cummulative to get the gradient right....

There are people on the way and the global markets are growing all over the place. Are you getting used jet emails all the time?? I think people are going to apply profits because they are allowed to by the size of the profits. I can feel people being in the groove with 10....20 ...30 ....40 ...50 cars.... I can feel the people doing 5,000...10k ...20k shares on picks from unusual volume. !0% in 4 days.....10% in 3 days..... 10% in 2 1/2 days.... kay now we are doing 100 turns a year in stocks. how many streams??? Are we going to 100K shares as a stream limit????

The markets offer EVERY SINGLE DAY. It's so cool..... Why does Todd answer all the questions???? One reason...... we have to fix what is busted out there..... the capital has to be taken out of the pools and put in places where things can be fixed.... there are no boundaries anymore.... anyone can step up and use their minds to get it down and then step up and help....

How many people can you feed with 40K made in two hours???

The era of pool extraction is beginning.... I really dig it... the pools are huge...they aren't going away........and now people know how to extract...

Imagine what it would be like if math and logic were applied???

Thank God this stuff doesn't work for greedy people lol.....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top