I didn't say that he was within his rights to hit the guy because of a disagreement. I said he could remove the guy with force if he felt the guy was presenting a threat to him or his family.
The cops could have pressed charges even without consent from the battered teacher IF they thought a law had been violated by the homeowner.
They could clearly see how busted up the teacher was. They probably heard both sides of the story and determined the homeowner may have been well within his rights to use violent force against the teacher.
We simply don't know.
As for your asshole dog owner neighbor- well, going by what you've told me, How could you possibly have any reason to wack him with a ball bat?
As you have said, when you call him, he comes over per your request to discuss with you in a civil manner what could possibly be an over dramatic reaction on your part.
If you feel the dog is emanating an immediate threat to you or your family, you could kill it and be well under the protection of law.
Perhaps if you politely told your neighbor this, he would practice better control of his potentially dangerous pet.
Regarding my neighbor's dog ... we live in a golf course community where there are rules and regulations ... our neighbor has been warned multiple times by the board relative to the dog. Every time the owner has been in denial even though he was never present at the time of the incidents. I addressed him as politely as possible .. he or his wife sent a text to my wife saying we were exaggerating things. Never mind other resident have been 'charged' by this aggressive dog.
If we killed the dog we'd have the burden of proof that we were in danger .... not easily provable IMO.
