Fast Food and Minimum Wage

Quote from piezoe:

If Morgan Stanley got involved, I can envision acres upon acres of cold storage units in Cushing, Oklahoma, all stacked to the ceiling with BigMacs. Then the public would start howling about Wall Street speculators pushing up the price of BigMacs, with no intention whatsoever to eat them all themselves.:D

Wall street would "explain" that the speculators were doing us all a favor by adding liquidity to the BigMac market, and the real reason for the steep rise in the price of a BigMac was increased demand. Not exactly a lie, but in the time honored tradition of Wall Street, not exactly the truth either.

Then the BigMac Desk at Morgan Stanley would swing into action hawking BigMac contracts to German Banks anxious to get in on the BigMac Boom. The price of BigMac contracts all the while reaching new highs. The banks would be happy until the contracts neared expiration, liquidity dried up, and there was no one to take their BigMac contracts off their hands. They would soon be the less than happy recipients of millions of frozen BigMacs. :D :D

German's would not go hungry for a long time. Meanwhile Morgan Stanley would begin buying insulin futures and filling their empty, Cushing, cold storage units with delivered insulin cars.
finally, someone is starting to make some sense around here. Like I told them, "If you think it is so easy betting on the future, why don't you put on a contract and see how it goes for you?"

But getting back to the minimum wage...
 
Quote from TGregg:

Has there ever been a liberal answer to "If a minimum wage is so great, why not make it $100 an hour?"
Has there ever been a conservative who understands cost/benefit analysis?
 
Quote from Ricter:

Has there ever been a conservative who understands cost/benefit analysis?

Sure! What would you like to discuss on it. I'm ready and waiting. What is it that we don't understand?
 
Quote from Tsing Tao:

Sure! What would you like to discuss on it. I'm ready and waiting. What is it that we don't understand?
Has there ever been a stick-up-butt-libertarian who recognizes a rhetorical question? :D
 
Quote from Ricter:

Has there ever been a stick-up-butt-libertarian who recognizes a rhetorical question? :D
Translation: Ricky's question is unsubstantiated bull shit and he knows it.
 
Quote from Lucrum:

Translation: Ricky's question is unsubstantiated bull shit and he knows it.

Of course it is. I didn't honestly think he'd actually engage me. :)
 
Quote from TGregg:

Has there ever been a liberal answer to "If a minimum wage is so great, why not make it $100 an hour?"
Our goal should be to bring the minimum wage in line with minimum wage productivity. A proxy for that may be achieved by raising the minimum wage to the level of the real cost of minimum wage labor. That is, today, very likely, somewhere between 10 and 11 dollars an hour. If we do that, we can greatly reduce cost shifting and have a far more honest economy.

Of course there are downsides to setting a minimum wage. The Heritage Foundation has, on its website, a long diatribe on all the downsides to raising the minimum wage. In my extremely humble opinion, however, all of the negatives are outweighed by the positives; the chief one being reduction of cost shifting, which is obtained by bringing the minimum wage to a level that closely reflects the actual cost of minimum wage labor. That level is currently somewhere between $10 and $15/hr, depending on locale. Setting the minimum wage near $10 makes good sense. In high cost of living areas, it will naturally seek a higher level.
 
Back
Top