Tsing, I'd prefer that you referred to me as an efficient government type, rather than a big government type.Quote from Tsing Tao:
Ludicrous to left wing, big government types like yourself, sure.
It doesn't work in Europe because of the aforementioned issues - hence why your comparison to Europe is not an apples to apples one. But it absolutely works here (when allowed to by the Feds) and it was designed to work as such.
"The Tenth Amendment of the United States Constitution makes all âpowers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.â
I just wanted to mention that setting a national minimum wage is a power granted to the Federal government by the Constitution under the Commerce clause. This has been tested in the Court (see U.S. v. Darby Lumber Co., 312 U.S. 100, 1941.) States naturally, may at their option legislate a higher minimum wage, because doing so does not violate the federal statute. And that's as it should be in my opinion.
Much more interesting are Statutory laws that set aside certain powers granted to the Federal Government under the Constitution and reserve them to the States. One could argue that these statutes are an abrogation of Federal Responsibility. An example would be the McCarran-Ferguson Act.
The Constitution is silent on the issue of whether the Federal Government can abrogate it responsibilities by Statute. I would think it certainly can by statute, but not by neglect.
I think it would be a very, very bad idea for the Federal government to, by statute, leave setting the minimum wage entirely to the States. The current arrangement is best.