Quote from lpchad:
I am thinking of picking up about 2000-3000 shares in FAS. At these levels near $3.75, my downside risk is not really something I need to be worried about with such low amounts of capital being committed. Long term, (5-10 years) when the financials do eventually come back (think previous 52 week high at some point) I will have done well for myself banking nearly $100K.
If you are in your 20s like me and have some IRA money to throw around, what is there to not like about this scenario? What is there to lose? This would represent about 25% IRA money, rest is sitting in cash.
Thoughts?
Chad,
Leveraged ETFs have a potential costly problem of decay, because the value of the leveraged ETFs are based on the MOVEMENT of the underlying indices, and not based on the VALUE of the underlying indices.
Example:
Underlying index is trading at $100, a 3x bull ETF is current trading also at $100
Day 1:
The underlying index goes up 10%, finishing the day at $110
The 3x ETF goes up 30%, finishing the day at $130
Day 2:
The underlying index goes down 10%, finishing the day at $99
The 3x ETF goes down by 30%, finishing the day at $91
That is a decay of $8 more for the leveraged ETF compared to the index
All leveraged ETFs naturally decay, and at two different time periods, while the underlying index may be trading at the same value, leveraged ETFs will trade at different values, with the lower value at the later period. This is true for both bull and bear leveraged ETFs.
Due to decay, traditional investment strategies such as buy and hold, and averaging down, do not work to the same extent as they work on common stocks and unleveraged ETFs. Holding a leveraged ETF while its value is decreasing, to recover the value of the leveraged ETF, the underlying index has to be much higher than when it was dropping.
Consider buying the financials themselves or a non-leveraged ETF.