Fantastic speech by Milwaukee police chief regarding whose lives actually matter

I'm just going to leave this here. This was the response to me suggesting BLM actually consider ALL Black lives sacred instead of just rallying against the cops. They are conspicuously silent when black on black crime occurs. As is the MSM. As is the entire Democratic Party. I wonder why.


userque said:
Assuming it's true that the number of Black on Black murders is greater than the number of Blacks killed by police; I submit that the number of 'innocent' Blacks killed by Blacks is less than the number of Blacks killed by police. This is, imo, inter alia, why the focus is on police killings.

The name BLM doesn't mean that they investigate all manner of a Black person's life, to make sure it always matters. They aren't investigating whether Blacks are dying at a higher rate than whites in workplace accidents. They're leaving that to OSHA and shop stewards.

You don't get to decide what they should and shouldn't be doing; you don't work there, just like you don't work at ACLU, as you said above.

Rather than these regular citizens getting involved with trying to identify which gang banger killed which other gang banger; they leave that job those paid to do it: the police. These workers live in the same neighborhoods as the gang bangers. They have families. They won't turn themselves into a snitching organization.

Surely you can understand this logic.
More...
 
CaptainObvious said:
Maybe if CNN and MSNBC ran this on a continuous loop for the next 24 hours we might actually be able to take a fucking breath and find some common ground.
More...

But that wouldn't hurt Trump's election chances, so we can't have that.
 
Tsing Tao said:
I'm just going to leave this here. This was the response to me suggesting BLM actually consider ALL Black lives sacred instead of just rallying against the cops. They are conspicuously silent when black on black crime occurs. As is the MSM. As is the entire Democratic Party. I wonder why.
More...
I'm confused by the idea that "All lives matter" is now deemed offensive hate speech.

Can I take that to mean that only black lives matter and conversely non-black lives do not matter? I mean, can a guy lose his job for saying "All lives matter"? Does stating that non-black lives matter somehow imply that black lives do not matter?

Morally and factually "All lives matter" ought to be regarded for what it is. Truth. The long version is that "All lives matter equally under God" which is sound and consistent with our judeo-christian origins.

Clearly "All lives matter" is correct and noble. All fractional decompositions of that are non-sequitur.

Either all lives matter or no lives matter. All Venn space between those assertions is immoral.
 
Snarkhund said:
I'm confused by the idea that "All lives matter" is now deemed offensive hate speech.

Can I take that to mean that only black lives matter and conversely non-black lives do not matter? I mean, can a guy lose his job for saying "All lives matter"? Does stating that non-black lives matter somehow imply that black lives do not matter?

Morally and factually "All lives matter" ought to be regarded for what it is. Truth. The long version is that "All lives matter equally under God" which is sound and consistent with our judeo-christian origins.

Clearly "All lives matter" is correct and noble. All fractional decompositions of that are non-sequitur.

Either all lives matter or no lives matter. All Venn space between those assertions are immoral.
More...

Apparently you can lose your job for saying "All Lives Matter". Such is the nature of liberal stupidity nowadays.

Sacramento Kings announcer Grant Napear out following 'All Lives Matter' tweet

 
It should be noted that the video clip in the OP was from November of 2014. Liberals will tell us this is an old clip so it should be ignored.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top