False Flag Bombing? ... Very Compelling Argument

[jem]

agree... these are prime suspects.

Quote from LEAPup:

The guy walking with the "detonator" didn't have a detonator. That's not one. It IS a radiation detector, however. And I'll note, he was armed. Gun right on the hip with shirt over it.

The two guys standing there in khaki cargo pants, with black backpacks, and one wearing the hat Chris Kyle used to wear, feds.

The bombers will most likely be those two middle eastern looking shit heads who weren't paying attention to the race, and were seen with bags, then WITHOUT.

These are the two I'd be wanting to talk to:

 

[jem]

the backpack does seems to have similar straps making that pack a suspect. I would want to do some intense analysis on the packs and that photo.

so this guy could be suspect depending on my analysis.

Quote from LEAPup:

I'd also want to talk to this crazy looking dude as well

Gubment behind this? Nope. There were feds everywhere in that crowd wearing yes, khaki tactical pants, boots, earpieces, guns, back packs with weapons, and radiation detectors. Bomb detectors? Sure. One problem, however. Black powder (not smokeless powder used in cartridges for guns), I'm talking about the old time black powder puts off a white signature like the bombs did. And no, the detecting equipment will NOT detect black powder. Not even at the airports.:eek:

 

[jem]

Overall... as a guy not big on the false flag stuff.

I suspect there was intel.
They beefed up security.
They pretended it was just a pre race drill and jack bauer did not get to some of the bombs in time.

If that is not the real scenario we have one sinister group in charge of our govt.

 

[LEAPup]

Quote from jem:

agree... these are prime suspects.

And take note the one in the white hat no longer has the large black back pack on anymore. He had it on in other pics. Of course, he could have taken it off and placed it beside him, but none the less, it's very odd.

 

[LEAPup]

Quote from jem:

the backpack does seems to have similar straps making that pack a suspect. I would want to do some intense analysis on the packs and that photo.

so this guy could be suspect depending on my analysis.

He'd certainly be one I'd do a hell of a background on then go talk to him.

 

[LEAPup]

Quote from jem:

Overall... as a guy not big on the false flag stuff.

I suspect there was intel.
They beefed up security.
They pretended it was just a pre race drill and jack bauer did not get to some of the bombs in time.

If that is not the real scenario we have one sinister group in charge of our govt.

Yep, probably had some intel. I've been in some massive crowds where the feds were there scoping it out, but this time they were carrying around sniffers out in the open. Again, problem was there's no detector for black powder.

Last, we already have a sinister group in charge of OUR government.

 

[pspr]

More odd behavior by the Administration.

Could it be happening again? Could a Saudi terror cell be behind another major U.S. attack? And could the Saudi government be trying to sink the investigation?

After 9/11, the Saudi ambassador demanded the evacuation of dozens of Saudi nationals, including bin Laden kin, before the FBI could properly question them. He got his wish, even though 15 of the 19 hijackers were Saudis and others had ties to the plot.

Eerily similar high-level intervention is taking place in the Boston bombings case. Consider this timeline:

Jan. 14, 2013: President Obama meets in the Oval Office with Saudi minister of interior.

Jan. 16: Homeland Security Director Janet Napolitano signs "arrangement" with Saudi minister bestowing "trusted traveler" status on Saudi student visitors, shortcutting normal security screening procedures.

April 15: Saudi college student Abdulrahman Ali Alharbi is seen near the Boston marathon finish line with two other Saudis. He's tackled after fleeing the scene of one of the bombings. Authorities question him.

April 15: FBI agents search Alharbi's apartment, leave with bags of evidence. He's described as a "person of interest" in attacks.

April 16: Secretary of State John Kerry secretly meets with the Saudi foreign minister, locking out reporters who initially were told the meeting would be open.

April 16: Saudi ambassador phones several papers and insists neither Alharbi nor any Saudi nationals are involved in the bombings. Saudi officials visit the well-connected Alharbi at a Boston hospital.

April 17: Officials clear Alharbi, who's reportedly related to al-Qaida Gitmo detainees, as a person of interest.

April 17: FBI ID from photos and videos two Mideast-looking men with bags scouting scene of bombings and circulate them among law enforcement. AP, CNN and even Boston Globe report one arrest has been made. CNN describes suspect as "dark-skinned male." Media swarm Boston courthouse for arraignment.

April 17: Obama has sudden unscheduled meeting with the Saudi foreign minister at White House.

April 17: Justice Dept. scolds CNN for arrest report. FBI cancels press conference. Courthouse bomb scare.

April 17: Terror expert Steve Emerson reports ICE has been ordered to "deport" Alharbi for "national security" reasons, out of reach of FBI questioning.

April 18: Napolitano denies Alharbi will be deported.

Did the Saudi minister request diplomatic-level immunity? Did Obama sign off on a "voluntary" departure?

"The level of coincidence required for the Saudi kid Ali Alharbi to be at the Boston Marathon at the time of the bombing and near the finish line where the bombs went off is staggering," a DHS official told IBD.

Why was he there? Was he cheering on someone running in the race? We don't know, and if he's allowed to leave the country, we may never know.

http://news.investors.com/ibd-edito...ing-timeline-suggests-obama-saudi-coverup.htm

 

[budcampbell]

This situation,imo is bigger than the two suspects. Krauthammer on Fox called it a crude operation. I disagree, this was a precision operation by professional criminals and mass-murderers, obviously right under the nose of massive security. As far as the conspiracy angle, I have no idea. Wasn't there a third bombing across town at the same time?

 

[LEAPup]

Quote from pspr:

More odd behavior by the Administration.

Could it be happening again? Could a Saudi terror cell be behind another major U.S. attack? And could the Saudi government be trying to sink the investigation?

After 9/11, the Saudi ambassador demanded the evacuation of dozens of Saudi nationals, including bin Laden kin, before the FBI could properly question them. He got his wish, even though 15 of the 19 hijackers were Saudis and others had ties to the plot.

Eerily similar high-level intervention is taking place in the Boston bombings case. Consider this timeline:

Jan. 14, 2013: President Obama meets in the Oval Office with Saudi minister of interior.

Jan. 16: Homeland Security Director Janet Napolitano signs "arrangement" with Saudi minister bestowing "trusted traveler" status on Saudi student visitors, shortcutting normal security screening procedures.

April 15: Saudi college student Abdulrahman Ali Alharbi is seen near the Boston marathon finish line with two other Saudis. He's tackled after fleeing the scene of one of the bombings. Authorities question him.

April 15: FBI agents search Alharbi's apartment, leave with bags of evidence. He's described as a "person of interest" in attacks.

April 16: Secretary of State John Kerry secretly meets with the Saudi foreign minister, locking out reporters who initially were told the meeting would be open.

April 16: Saudi ambassador phones several papers and insists neither Alharbi nor any Saudi nationals are involved in the bombings. Saudi officials visit the well-connected Alharbi at a Boston hospital.

April 17: Officials clear Alharbi, who's reportedly related to al-Qaida Gitmo detainees, as a person of interest.

April 17: FBI ID from photos and videos two Mideast-looking men with bags scouting scene of bombings and circulate them among law enforcement. AP, CNN and even Boston Globe report one arrest has been made. CNN describes suspect as "dark-skinned male." Media swarm Boston courthouse for arraignment.

April 17: Obama has sudden unscheduled meeting with the Saudi foreign minister at White House.

April 17: Justice Dept. scolds CNN for arrest report. FBI cancels press conference. Courthouse bomb scare.

April 17: Terror expert Steve Emerson reports ICE has been ordered to "deport" Alharbi for "national security" reasons, out of reach of FBI questioning.

April 18: Napolitano denies Alharbi will be deported.

Did the Saudi minister request diplomatic-level immunity? Did Obama sign off on a "voluntary" departure?

"The level of coincidence required for the Saudi kid Ali Alharbi to be at the Boston Marathon at the time of the bombing and near the finish line where the bombs went off is staggering," a DHS official told IBD.

Why was he there? Was he cheering on someone running in the race? We don't know, and if he's allowed to leave the country, we may never know.

http://news.investors.com/ibd-edito...ing-timeline-suggests-obama-saudi-coverup.htm

Mind boggling!!!!!!!!!!! WOW!:eek: :eek: :eek:
And, "Did the Saudi minister request diplomatic-level immunity? Did Obama sign off on a "voluntary" departure?" Obammer bowed to the Saudi king, so why not grant his request to get the little bastard out of the Country. Hell, only 3 people (one a little boy), were murdered, and over a hundred badly injured in a TERRORIST ATTACK ON US!!!

 

[PHOENIX TRADING]

Quote from jem:

Overall... as a guy not big on the false flag stuff.


They pretended it was just a pre race drill and jack bauer did not get to some of the bombs in time.

If that is not the real scenario we have one sinister group in charge of our govt.

I think they are both sinister and opportunistic.
So far the obama admin sounds embarrassed by where the evidence lead(saudi national).

So they are going to deport him (so that he won't embarrass obama with being questioned).

Now they are faced with the prospect of finding a patsy to blame it upon, preferably a tea party member.