No, genetics is not a factor, because we see different cultures of the same race, with different values, laws, etc.
In this country, we have different laws and values within the white race, just visit California, then go to the deep south....
Not genetics.
Your argument is flawed....
and this type of argument is generally used to rationalize racism as something that is "scientifically" grounded.
And no, I don't support your belief that genetics is a foundation of criminal behavior by blacks.
In this country, we have different laws and values within the white race, just visit California, then go to the deep south....
Not genetics.
Your argument is flawed....
and this type of argument is generally used to rationalize racism as something that is "scientifically" grounded.
And no, I don't support your belief that genetics is a foundation of criminal behavior by blacks.
Quote from spect8or:
In any society, laws are made and followed by man, even if man attributes those laws to God. Laws are always arbitrary, and vary from culture to culture, even among homogeneous races, as determined not by genetics, but by culture, belief systems...personal choice.
They laws of a society are the product of human mind, not genetics. Therefore, genetics simply does not, could not, be the cause of violation of those laws.
To suggest that violation of laws, i.e. criminal behavior is found in genetics is simply false.
So laws are determined by culture. What determines culture? Why wouldn't genes play a role there? Surely the role of enviornment is minimal: North American Indians and native Europeans occupied more or less the same sort of environment yet produced vastly different cultures.
So to the extent that genes do play a role, you're admitting that blacks are unable to follow the white man's laws (to the same extent that whites are) because they're not culturally, which is to say genetically, predisposed to following them, which is to agree with my position that blacks are more "criminal", as defined by whites' laws.