Well Mr. think you know what everyone is thinking, that's not what I was implying at all. I'm saying if I'm in a pinch I want this chick in my corner. See how f'n stupid you look when you jump to conclusions? Share that with the race pimps, would ya' now? Bye.It could be she is part of the plot. She neglected to live-stream the part where the driver threatened to push a button on the inside of the door that would detonate a 2 kilatron bomb in the trunk that would take out the whole neighborhood. When the live stream starts running, we can hear the officer says "F*#k!", which was a reference to the unbelievably huge bomb the driver had threatened to detonate. The officer kept the gun pointed at him to make sure he could not reach the button on the inside of the door.
Well Mr. think you know what everyone is thinking, that's not what I was implying at all. I'm saying if I'm in a pinch I want this chick in my corner. See how f'n stupid you look when you jump to conclusions? Share that with the race pimps, would ya' now? Bye.
What is a "2 kilotron" bomb? Can anyone into bomb culture elaborate please.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The point I am making is that the lawyer for the family stated the driver immediately told officers he had a permit and a gun. The family's statements on this are unclear if the driver told the police **immediately**, they make it sound he said something when reaching for his registration. The police have made no official statement on this subject but defenders of the police claim the driver never told the police he had a gun (which is dubious at best).
The officers were not wearing body cams (something I would urge all police forces to have). However they should have video rolling in their police car showing the entire incident. This video should be made public immediately (something the police are not doing).
It is hard to state as this time as a fact if the driver told the police immediately that he had a permit and was armed, if he told the officers later when reaching for his registration, or if he did not mention it at all. I would hope audio recording from the police car would capture this.
You can tell what size bomb a driver threatens to detonate by an officer's reaction. For example, if an officer says, "holy hydrogen batman!", you know it's a one kilotron bomb that the driver threatens to detonate. A bomb that size could blow up Gotham City and a few suburbs. If an officer says, "Christ almighty!" then you know the bomb is big enough to destroy the entire world. We know this was a 2 kilotron bomb because the officer said, "F*#k!", several times. No matter what sized bomb, you want to make sure the driver cannot reach the button on the inside of the door to detonate it. That usually requires four or FIVE SHOTS. That way, you still have a few rounds of back up in case a dying driver is able to get his thumb on the detonator button.
So that man can have that gun legal in conceal in his car. When the police stop him to ask for the ID, they see the gun. They are afraid. They kill him because he has the gun that is equal their gun. They think they will die. They shoot. So both are legal to have guns, but who is using their gun from fear, panic?