Maybe you need to understand how data is collected and used from a surveillance reporting systems... and how medical specialists follow-up to specific reports to determine if there is any medical link to the vaccine.
Fact Checking Covid-Denier Nonsense
- Thread starter gwb-trading
- Start date
Maybe you need to understand how data is collected and used from a surveillance reporting systems... and how medical specialists follow-up to specific reports to determine if there is any medical link to the vaccine.
So should we use VAERS data or not?
Should we allow idiots to misrepresent what VAERS is and how it is used -- and push falsehoods about data found in VAERS. Absolutely not.
So tell us -- how do medical professionals following up on specific reports utilize VAERS. Explain the official process to us.
Let's fact check the latest nonsense from anti-vax Covid-deniers that Denmark stopped it COVID vaccination program due to myocarditis. Actually the country paused the program due to its high vaccination rate.
Fact Check-Denmark paused its COVID-19 vaccine program due to high inoculation
https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-coronavirus-denmark-idUSL2N2WV0TT
VERDICT
Missing context. Denmark has temporarily paused its COVID-19 vaccination program and not stopped it entirely. It has been paused due to the country’s high vaccine coverage, not because of a study into myocarditis.
Fact Check-Denmark paused its COVID-19 vaccine program due to high inoculation
https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-coronavirus-denmark-idUSL2N2WV0TT
VERDICT
Missing context. Denmark has temporarily paused its COVID-19 vaccination program and not stopped it entirely. It has been paused due to the country’s high vaccine coverage, not because of a study into myocarditis.
So should we use VAERS data? Or not?
Second try - So tell us -- how do medical professionals following up on specific reports utilize VAERS. Explain the official process to us.
Do you even understand the basic purpose of VAERS?
I'll answer if you answer my question which was posed first (and several times now).
And who magically declared the Moderna Covid vaccine 3% effective in October? Point to the evidence. And we don't mean the typical crap you push from anti-vax extremists fabricating nonsense.
Just to clarify, you're only debating the 3% effective declaration, not the 85% effective before being restricted for adverse health related issues, right?
As for the 3%, here is a read (which you won't look at)