In the same way as dotcom IPOs signaled the 2001 crash, and Google IPO signaled 2008 crash?
The point is tech companies tend to go on IPO near the top as they need an economy that APPEARS to be growing/recovering in order to get people to buy their shares in the IPO.Quote from ugz:
don't you think that's an oversimplification regarding google, came out on 2004 and 2008 it was a housing debt bubble
You are missing the pointQuote from dumb_mother:
wouldn't blackstone's ipo be more of an identifier of the last recession- i feel like they went public like a month before the top and are much smarter money than tech companies.
Quote from latinotrader:
You are missing the point
IPOs tend to increase toward the top, and tend to be nonexistent near the bottom.
It doesn't matter if they are tech or military companies
Blackstone, google, dotcoms, and facebook
all these IPOs are made by insiders so they can dump their shares into greater fools.
Smart money are sensing they are near a top
Quote from latinotrader:
In the same way as dotcom IPOs signaled the 2001 crash, and Google IPO signaled 2008 crash?
Quote from CommunistMonkey:
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=when+was+google+ipo
Yes, Google's IPO on Aug 19th 2004 caused the top in late 2007 and the crash at the end of 2008. It just took them 3 full calendar years to top out and another year to meltdown.
Please don't post anymore without having a vague notion of what you're talking about.
When you see google being the highest priced company in the world you are sure you are near the top.Quote from CommunistMonkey:
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=when+was+google+ipo
Yes, Google's IPO on Aug 19th 2004 caused the top in late 2007 and the crash at the end of 2008. It just took them 3 full calendar years to top out and another year to meltdown.
Please don't post anymore without having a vague notion of what you're talking about.