Fabulous Life of Billion Dollar Wall St. Baller

Quote from rubibond007:

Look pal, there's no need to use this kind of language. The truth is that you'r posts looks very arrogant.

I haven't see you "sharing" any experience, Just selling your "method". you has been very aggressive and very inmature, that's why you peformance was very poor during the past 3 years (bull markets years).

You lost everything, Cause YOU made the mistake, Not because "this is unfair bla bla bla".

You should try a psiquiatric treatment for you big Ego. sometimes, you sound more like a clown.

PD: i dont want to bash you, the fact is that Im happy for you success in the past, And I wish you the best in the future. But you has been very inmature and very arrogant.

1. I'm down 1/3 off my highs, not everything, much better than Faith, Livermore, etc

2. I include the ego to show how it lead to my losses. But it's also the gift and the curse because it allowed me to take on huge risks, which helped me enjoy huge gains

3.I don't think anything is unfair, I take full responsibility for my gains and losses.

Quote from gaj:

well, i have read it.

it's a lot of whining about the CYGT incident (and why won't anyone give him billions of dollars for a non-scalable model). it's not poorly written, but the title is completely misleading; it's got no relevance to livermore or darvas' books which were legendary, nor really a 'hedge fund' (it's more a friends and family grouping which registered as a hedge fund).

there's a ton of books which are better for traders - techniques of tape reading gives a lot of how-to's which sykes' book implies, but never delivers. there's a number of books for those who want to start a hedge fund - that part is omitted as well.


Its fine if you don't like it, but to say the title is misleading is simply inaccurate. I don't claim to be the great American hedge fund, just an example of one startup fund. And, since you read that I didn't start my fund until halfway through the book, it's not only limited to my days as a hedge fund manager, but instead refers to the entire idea of a hedge fund and the speculative techniques they employ. Yeeesh, some people have no imagination! And FYI when the subtitle is "How I..." of course I'm going to talk about myself!

Some people wanted a hardcore strategy book, but I think sharing personal experiences is much more helpful--plenty of strategy books out there, most of them BS--but not one other finance book that is so detailed in $ gains and losses and how that effected the author's life
 
Quote from TimothySykes:

In my book, I actually discuss how they asked me to appear in this show, but after a few weeks of trying to figure out scheduling, they stopped calling. Probly figured out how small-time I was. It's a sad commentary on the lack of transparency in the industry that it took them weeks to get all the info on me!

I once scored an unprecedented 4 touchdowns in a High School football game. I remember I was on the front page of the newspaper. It was great. 4 touchdowns. I got laid that night too.
 
Quote from doublea:

It's on VH1. Pretty Amazing!!!


Wait, Wait, VH1

Isnt that a Music channel, now they are doing shows on wealthy individuals, this programming doesnt make much sense, I think its time MTV and VH1 get their act together and put something on called, MUSIC TELEVISION....

fools.
 
Quote from TimothySykes:

Its fine if you don't like it, but to say the title is misleading is simply inaccurate. I don't claim to be the great American hedge fund, just an example of one startup fund

<br>
i do say SOME people would like it (see below #1). it could have been far, far worse - it's not wade cook or anything terrible like that. it's light reading.

title has three parts:

the first is an american hedge fund
if you ask most people, their idea of a hedge fund is FAR larger than what you had. i believe the average fund had 150mm under management in 2006.

the rest of it is cheap attempts to capitalize off the success of two classic books by livermore and darvas, and bears no resemblance to either. livemore's is full of trading nuggets which were not generally known (save some writing by wyckoff, neill, etc.) and darvas' is a how-to course on buying breakouts, using stops, etc. - again, at the time, classic stuff. and it still works. yes, there's the 'short high flyers' part in yours, but that's such a small part of the book.

Some people wanted a hardcore strategy book, but I think sharing personal experiences is much more helpful

which is why i said in my review (which has been posted elsewhere) that:

<i>who would enjoy this book? (1) people who watch cnbc as a hobby or a social friend. voyeurs who like to imagine the successes of others being their own. and, sure, people who have never read a trading book before - or don't know what things were like in the late 1990s - can gain some information here. it is well-written, even when it strays from the main focus of a trading book. <b>but with the proliferation of so many better trading books and with this one having such a misleading title, why spend the money to get this one?</B></I>

just thinking about it - if you were already a bonafide celebrity, this would be a much more justifiable book to write. cramer *could* have gotten away with this kind of book, but thankfully didn't (see below, #2)

and off the top of my head: books which combine some or all of what you state you're doing, but do it *well* (note: some are purely strategy books, some incorporate the author's life into the picture. and i'm leaving out a lot here):

_techniques of tape reading_ - schumacher / graifer
(2) _confessions of a stock (something) - cramer
_trade like a hedge fund _ - altucher
dave landry's materials
trader vic's first book.
stan weinstein's book.
tony oz
linda raschke
 
Quote from S2007S:

I think its time MTV and VH1 get their act together and put something on called, MUSIC TELEVISION....

fools.

mtv's been dead for years, except to 18-30s who want 'reality' tv. yup, i know some who watch the programming...in fact, they've been tying in internet stuff with those reality shows.

i think the death of music (on mtv) got rolling with the success of the real world, but i remember watching mtv's _remote control_ (showing my age now) with ken ober, colin quinn, random female, and a then-unknown kid named adam sandler...

vh1's pretty much killed off most music as well. they have something which comes on periodically in the am (jump start?) and has AAA music, but that's it.

i think you have to request MTV2 (which i don't get) or listen to fuse (formerly much music, out of canada) to get music videos.

i'll just get online streaming audio from certain channels, but generally just find new music and go from there. current likes: go! team, kaiser chiefs, nightmare of you, franz ferdinand, hot hot heat, bravery, bloc party, panic @disco/fall out boy, the twang, various mashups such as some by party ben (hoping he goes to bootienyc in dec.!), just different stuff.
 
Quote from wunder:

YOU STARTED to believe your own lies

good for you , real traders laugh at you Tim, you are a joke

You know what? He's posting here, with his real name. You know all about him - his successes, failures, scandals, whatever. All the while you go on insulting him under a pseudonym, hiding behind the anonymity of the internet. And here I go pointing this out to you under my false name as well. We're a bunch of internet tough guys, you and I, eh?

Tim, it would seem, is quite courageous. Let the guy be.
 
Back
Top