Quote from Neoxx:
Looking over the charts for RIMM and SHLD, I think I've extracted some of the salient points for your credit spread strategy.
1) Channeling stock
2) Long term neutrality
2) Entry on a pivot point with directional bias.
3) A $10 range on each side of the S/R level, so that if you're correct about direction, your $5 target will be a very high probability one, and if you're wrong, there's ample leeway to benefit from a move in the opposite direction.
4) By virtue of the necessary range, this is confined to higher priced stocks
You got some concepts correct but I value certain things far more than others.
1) A channelling stock isn't a bad thing but a channel can be a bit tricky. As much as many books would like to claim that there are certain places that you can draw trend lines, where to put them can be left completely up to the person reading the chart. If you see a channel, you have to be confident that everyone else sees the same channel. If noone else sees it then the stock will wander right through what you thought would be support or resistance.
2) I don't really look for long term neutrality. It just turns out that many of the setups that I like, fall into that category. Long term neutrality many times gives very established S/R by which you can base your entry and exits.
2) This is key! Count on the S/R to hold, but make sure that you aren't seeing S/R that isn't really there.
3) Yes, you need to know that if it decides to move in one direction, that it will likely continue in that direction. A setup like SHLD could possibly allow me to get in on both a bullish and bearish position.
4) My strategy isn't confined to higher priced stocks. But those above $30 generally lend more to this strategy. Lower priced stocks generally don't give me the credit that I look for because they aren't volatile enough.
A lot of it has to do with how much I stand to lose if the stock moves against me. The most critical factor is how close I have to get to S/R to get me the credit that I want. In th case of RIMM, I almost didn't trade it because I had to be right on support to get filled. That really decreases the odds for success.
Then I have to find a stock that has REAL (demonstrated) support or resistance. I don't like to be guessing as to whether or not others will be lining up to buy or sell at a given point.
I also factor into the equation, short interest, institutional buying/selling, and directional bias for the sector/market, dollar weighted put/call ratio, and to some extent relative strength.