Explain Santelli's Logic (Today's New Comment) To Me

Quote from Trader666:

Either you're a total moron or you have zero sense of personal responsibility because my point has gone completely over your head.

Are you so bitter because you're a "victim" of the banks?

People with no personal responsibility nor credit worthiness nor collateral nor worth, were the exact people banks sought to GIVE AWAY money to with these loans.That is the whole point of sub prime.
You cant comprehend this can you?
 
Quote from Trader666:

For a website supposedly populated by traders, it's amazing how many people don't get the concept of personal responsibility. Guess what wannabee...it's IMPOSSIBLE to succeed at trading without a total sense of personal responsibility.

If you're irresponsible and looking for easy money vote democrap and bleed the government.

I guess bankers have no responsibility for their shareholders. or the overall expansion of credit which affects everybody
 
You can't comprehend my point so you keep spewing the same insipid crap.

Only a total loser would argue your side of this.

Which is worse, lying on a loan application or failing to verify?

If two parties (a bank and a consumer) enter into a legally binding contract and the consumer defaults, who is more at fault?

You can't debate these without red herrings and BS.
Quote from dsq:

People with no personal responsibility nor credit worthiness nor collateral nor worth, were the exact people banks sought to GIVE AWAY money to with these loans.That is the whole point of sub prime.
You cant comprehend this can you?
 
Is that what happened with you Landis82? You seem to have a personal interest in bailing out the deadbeats and freeloaders.
Quote from Landis82:

Bingo!
Quote from antitrust:

Some of these guys had no net worth (nothing to lose)

no credit score or bad credit score

and somebody gives them a loan with no questions asked???
 
Quote from Trader666:



Which is worse, lying on a loan application or failing to verify?


FAILING TO VERIFY...obviously.
Banks encouraged lying-remember 'stated income'?

If you didnt understand this concept then you should by now.I would never lend money to a stranger without collateral,credit check etc..would you?Basic common sense.
But in this case we are talking about hundreds of thousands of dollars being loaned out to strangers with poor credit,no documentation.Again banks intentionally sought out people who were irresponsible with finances...its called SUBPRIME/LIAR LOAN/NO DOC/STATED INCOME for a good reason...still dont get it?
 
Quote from Trader666:

I'm addressing your words which imply you don't.

Simple question for ya, T666. Have you ever been denied a loan?

If yes, why?

If no, then perhaps you haven't been around long enough to understand how the system USED to work. We can't help that ...
 
Quote from Illum:

:D :D :D
I snarfed and it hurt
:D

Snarfed??

Now if you said "snarted", I think I would get it. Or of course, "sharted" would also be understood.

Hmmm.
 
I asked: "Which is worse, lying on a loan application or failing to verify?" to which you responded as below.

You've just proven that you're a dimwit and you lack a sense of personal responsibility.

Lying on a loan is active fraud.

Failing to verify is passive negligence.

You need to be protected from yourself.
Quote from dsq:

FAILING TO VERIFY...obviously.
Banks encouraged lying-remember 'stated income'?
 
I've never been denied a loan and I've never needed to be protected from myself unlike many people here.

While my age is none of your business I bought my first house 25 years ago so I totally understand how the system used to work.

Quote from mephistoII:

Simple question for ya, T666. Have you ever been denied a loan?

If yes, why?

If no, then perhaps you haven't been around long enough to understand how the system USED to work. We can't help that ...
 
Back
Top