you're great at putting links up... maybe you should try reading them? or, if you are reading them, maybe you should try understanding them?Quote from reiser999:
The IRS link is still relevant, it does not contradict the 'Heart Act'
http://www.mwe.com/index.cfm/fuseac...t_id/36c3cb82-e7f9-4651-9668-f986d5f73e58.cfm
Government links:
Summary of Federal Income Tax Changes 2008
http://www.ftb.ca.gov/law/legis/08FedTax.pdf
Here is the House of Representatives Technical explanation of the Heart Act
http://www.house.gov/jct/x-44-08.pdf
The ten year rule applies if you stay in the US for longer than 30 days in any year of those ten years and you will be taxed worldwide for that year, in addition you still must pay the exit tax.
http://www.irs.gov/businesses/small/international/article/0,,id=97245,00.html
a quote from your first link: "A welcome aspect of the Act is that ATRâs 30-day rule does not apply to covered expatriates who may spend significant time in the United States..."
a quote from your 2nd and 3rd link: "Under the provision, the present-law expatriation income tax rules under section 877 do not apply with respect to a covered expatriate whose expatriation or residency termination occurs on or after the date of enactment."
do a search for section 877 and what do you get? you get a link to back to your 4th link: the IRS page on the exit tax... it's about as irrelevant as it gets.
a tip: read and understand links you put up which are supposed to back your argument. because, if they happen to contradict your argument, you will inevitably end up looking like an ass.