Oh please... the "sophomoric play on words" is YOURS. You said you don't predict, then I gave examples of you predicting. Then you claimed it's anticipation instead of prediction. Then when I showed you using the word "predict" in talking about your predictions, you tried to obfuscate by accusing me of playing word games. Give me a break.
Just like you're trying to obfuscate your failed turning point of a lifetime with an "inverted saucer"
and other drivel.
Your exact words were:
As a trader for 53 years, this turning point tomorrow is the most significant I have seen in my life.
You used the word "tomorrow" and it still hasn't happened, over a year later. Also note how insignificant that day turned out to be, and the far more significant turning points you didn't predict. So please spare us your "exact science" nonsense.
Just like you're trying to obfuscate your failed turning point of a lifetime with an "inverted saucer"
and other drivel. Your exact words were:
As a trader for 53 years, this turning point tomorrow is the most significant I have seen in my life.
You used the word "tomorrow" and it still hasn't happened, over a year later. Also note how insignificant that day turned out to be, and the far more significant turning points you didn't predict. So please spare us your "exact science" nonsense.
Quote from jack hershey:
I consider the long term economic and econometric local and international condition, circumstance and situation to be a significant context for people who have planes, strategies and routines.
In about JUN/JUL 2006, a depression began. The Camtasias from that point on took this into consideration as may be seen in the archives.
the significant quotes from me that you continually point out deal with more than the sophomoric play on words you do by word searching to find presumed differences.
Refer to van Tharp as a person who has documented Bull and Bear markets and their durations. I deal in finite math so I do not have a descriptor for other than either a Bull or Bear market designation.
The subject of your quote is the cureent Depression and assessing in advance anticipating the next point in the Depression construct.
Just as the climax rune of the last Bull market ending was complex, so is each point in the parallelogram that forms the current Depression. Points 1 and 2 are fairly well defined.
One the way to point 3 01SEP09 occurred. It terms of market formations, it defined a significant point in the current inverted saucer which surrounds point 3 (pre envent point 3, point 3 and post point 3).
All of this provides a context for the huge movements involved in depressions.
when markets move from an odd harmonic dominance (see point 2 surroundings) to an even harmonic dominance (the inverted saucer formation we are in) monitoring, analysis, decision making, and timely action can become more demanding.
Therefore, it is incumbant on responsible people to be more alert and more sensitive to the plight of others.
Specifically, an inverted saucer is a collection of sub channels formed by new point 2's and 3's using fanning at first and then using VE's after the dominant sentiment changes in the inverted suacer. This is an anticipated series of subformations within a major limiting formation (inverted saucer).
Depressions can last for a generation (my definition). They have scope and bounds. Point 1 and point 2 have occurred. Point 3 will determine the slope of the general formation. This event (point 3) is part of an inverted saucer). after the sucer ends, the thrird movement of the Depression is underway. More VE's will happen and at some point 5, 7 or 10 years out they will cease and the Depression container will be occupied by two sub moves (long then short) wheby the Depression will end.
All the above is the order of events for the time ahead. The events are noise and anomally free.
Certainly, as previously stated, these comments are contrued as "predictions" for some people and, for others, they just describe an order of events. Most people would regard the comments as unreliable and just opinions.
I feel my commentary on what is what is appropriate. Here you see I did use the CW term for the future and how the future is commonly described by CW oriented people. CW "implies" that there are bases for their predictions. There is no overlap between my systemmic orientation and the orientation of CW.
Trader666 doen't do what I do in any sense. This, fortunately, makes it possible for me to differentiate where I come from relative to such a person as t666.
Currently, the contemporary situation is that the big money perpetrators are two cycles ahead of the legislative tasks and the regulators follow, in sequence behind the regulators. for those of the CW persuasion things will be getting difficult. On May 6th, most people were able to notice what happens when those who have fiduciary responsibilities abrogate those responsibilities. It is a time that is very advantageous to those who do strategies and routines that are designed for all situations. Everyone gets to choose and decide how they operate.
