Ewj: elliott wave
- Thread starter mu200411
- Start date
Excerpted from The Elliott Wave Theorist by Bob Prechter, published April 18, 2009
Yes, Below 1000 in Dollar Terms
Readers sometimes ask if I am serious about the Dow eventually falling below 1000. People can understand that the Dow can fall in terms of gold, but they are so convinced about coming hyperinflation that they consider the idea of the nominal Dow in triple digits to be simply out of touch with reality.
The primary reason I believe the Dow is going to fall that far is its Elliott wave structure, which calls for it. But I can also see a monetary reason for this event. The tremendous inflation of the past 76 years has occurred primarily by way of instrument of credit, not banknotes. Credit can implode.
The only monetary outcome that will make sense of the Elliott wave structure is for the market value of dollar-denominated credit to shrink by over 90 percent. Given the eroded state of capital goods in the U.S. and the depletion of manufacturing capacity, it is not hard to see why all these IOUs have a deteriorating basis of repayment. The future has already been fully mortgaged; it's time to pay. But there is no money to pay, only more IOUs, which cannot be paid, either. So the credit supply (after a brief respite) will continue to shrink, which means that wealth, and therefore purchasing power, will disappear along with it. In the broadest sense, this change will constitute a collapse in the "money supply."
Such a monetary background would be consistent with the Dow falling below 1000 in nominal terms. It is one of the reasons that Conquer the Crash is subtitled How To Survive and Prosper in a Deflationary Depression. To be sure, the central bank does have the capacity to print banknotes. But I expect that the final implosion in credit value will be so swift that the authorities will not act in time to counter it. They will continue to try to maintain the fictions of full face value for IOUs until they fail spectacularly to keep up the scam. Then they will start to scramble, but it will be too late.
Yes, Below 1000 in Dollar Terms
Readers sometimes ask if I am serious about the Dow eventually falling below 1000. People can understand that the Dow can fall in terms of gold, but they are so convinced about coming hyperinflation that they consider the idea of the nominal Dow in triple digits to be simply out of touch with reality.
The primary reason I believe the Dow is going to fall that far is its Elliott wave structure, which calls for it. But I can also see a monetary reason for this event. The tremendous inflation of the past 76 years has occurred primarily by way of instrument of credit, not banknotes. Credit can implode.
The only monetary outcome that will make sense of the Elliott wave structure is for the market value of dollar-denominated credit to shrink by over 90 percent. Given the eroded state of capital goods in the U.S. and the depletion of manufacturing capacity, it is not hard to see why all these IOUs have a deteriorating basis of repayment. The future has already been fully mortgaged; it's time to pay. But there is no money to pay, only more IOUs, which cannot be paid, either. So the credit supply (after a brief respite) will continue to shrink, which means that wealth, and therefore purchasing power, will disappear along with it. In the broadest sense, this change will constitute a collapse in the "money supply."
Such a monetary background would be consistent with the Dow falling below 1000 in nominal terms. It is one of the reasons that Conquer the Crash is subtitled How To Survive and Prosper in a Deflationary Depression. To be sure, the central bank does have the capacity to print banknotes. But I expect that the final implosion in credit value will be so swift that the authorities will not act in time to counter it. They will continue to try to maintain the fictions of full face value for IOUs until they fail spectacularly to keep up the scam. Then they will start to scramble, but it will be too late.
Thanks blnbr,
It depends on what wave October 2007's Top is
.
If it is Wave V]IV)B of Irregular (INDU, TRAN), Flat (SPX) and Zigzag2 (COMPQ) then this rally is wave 1) .
If it is Wave V]V)V of normal wave five (INDU, TRAN) and wave five failure (SPX, COMPQ) then this rally is wave a) .
mu.
It depends on what wave October 2007's Top is
.If it is Wave V]IV)B of Irregular (INDU, TRAN), Flat (SPX) and Zigzag2 (COMPQ) then this rally is wave 1) .
If it is Wave V]V)V of normal wave five (INDU, TRAN) and wave five failure (SPX, COMPQ) then this rally is wave a) .
mu.
Quote from blnbr:
Good to hear your opinion Mu. You are right more often on the S&P.
Now letâs say we had finished wave-5 on the weekly chart and started the recent rally from March, how do you label this rally? Is it a wave-a or wave-1