Thanks, man.
Evolution debunked in 1 paragraph.
- Thread starter peilthetraveler
- Start date
Thanks, man.
yeah yeah ok, so you're angry. Another one of your arguments can't stand up.
Lol. Try telling an extremophile it doesn't live, it survives.
May I suggest for your argument, whatever it is, to even stand a chance of getting off the ground, you stop saying so many pathetic things.
You're trying to say because the background radiation temperature of the universe would be too low for known microbes to survive, that means they can't survive (or LIVE! ) in the vast areas of space where their temperature is not going to be at that background level?
Don't know where those vast areas would be, where temperature is going to be affected on all matter including extremophiles.?
Can't even guess?
So you start drawing silly pictures on a photo of yourself...... sheesh
No moron, I'm saying that when it comes to science you don't know your ass from your elbow as you've proved once again with your STUpid statement that I quoted in the pic at this link.
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=3301653#post3301653
Known extremophiles don't "live in environments" very much below the freezing point of water or above its boiling point. The temp of the universe is below -454F so what "vast areas" of outer space are hospitable? Even the temps on spacewalks in Earth's orbit vary from about 250F to -250F depending on sun or shade so what extremophile do you "think" can live in that environment? Without an atmosphere it's either fry or freeze, both of which have apparently happened to your "brain."
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=3301653#post3301653
Known extremophiles don't "live in environments" very much below the freezing point of water or above its boiling point. The temp of the universe is below -454F so what "vast areas" of outer space are hospitable? Even the temps on spacewalks in Earth's orbit vary from about 250F to -250F depending on sun or shade so what extremophile do you "think" can live in that environment? Without an atmosphere it's either fry or freeze, both of which have apparently happened to your "brain."
Lol. More of the creationists' crazy minded approach to rationality. Come up with any ridiculous remark, contradict it, whilst screaming everyone else is wrong.
So now you are saying temperatures other than -454 degrees F. do exist in outer space.
Dear me!
So I'll ask again where this started out.
Why mention -454F as if it is a determining factor when there is a vast range of differing temperatures in outer space where extremophiles could survive or live?
Quit trying to squirm off the hook, troll. You're the one who made this ridiculous claim so you tell me, which "extremeophiles" [sic] "live in environments" even remotely like outer space?
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=3301653#post3301653
Obviously -454F is the starting point, STUpid, because it's the temperature of the universe... and the extreme cold is so pervasive that galaxies have an average temperature of only a tiny fraction of a degree higher. Are you capable of understanding what that means in terms of what % of space is hospitable to known extremophiles? You clearly didn't know at the time you put your foot in your mouth.
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=3301653#post3301653
Obviously -454F is the starting point, STUpid, because it's the temperature of the universe... and the extreme cold is so pervasive that galaxies have an average temperature of only a tiny fraction of a degree higher. Are you capable of understanding what that means in terms of what % of space is hospitable to known extremophiles? You clearly didn't know at the time you put your foot in your mouth.
because the issue for any thinking person would be whether abiogenesis is good proven science... not whether there is good science going into the research.
The construction of your sentence manifests your typical troll intent. You could substitute the word abiogensis with cold fusion, search for aliens. search for Creator, eternal machine, time travel... etc.. you create virtually meaningless sentences to cover up your previous frauds.
You are the anti science athiest... I cite academics and nobel prize winners... and you fraudulently state there is good science showing that life evolved from non life... then try to imply you meant something else... which is still bullshit.
Obviously -454F is just as irrelevant as when you started your nonsense, being that there are vastly differing temperatures throughout the universe depending where or what is measured. Taking just one of them in isolation is, well, gaumless.
No surprise that you are also of course completely wrong about the temperatures of galaxies too. Again it depends entirely upon which part of which galaxy temperature is being measured.
They range into millions of degrees hotter than what you are calling the "-454F starting point", which in any case is no such thing as a starting point.
A starting point, if anything, would be the temperature calculated at the beginning of the universe, as almost immeasurably hot.
Taking one value, whilst ignoring the enormously vast range of other temperatures through both extremes with everything in between being present also, just to try and base your ignorant argument upon it, really isn't very clever.
You have no clue as to where and what habitable zones intersect in outer space or how much they would need to, to allow known extremophiles or even microbes trapped within meteorites or comets to live and survive a journey. Let alone any that may not yet be known of.
As you won't like any facts that don't match what you want them to, why not just revert to form and make yet another pathetically silly picture of yourself wearing a dunce's hat and start photoshop-ing it again?
No surprise that you are also of course completely wrong about the temperatures of galaxies too. Again it depends entirely upon which part of which galaxy temperature is being measured.
They range into millions of degrees hotter than what you are calling the "-454F starting point", which in any case is no such thing as a starting point.
A starting point, if anything, would be the temperature calculated at the beginning of the universe, as almost immeasurably hot.
Taking one value, whilst ignoring the enormously vast range of other temperatures through both extremes with everything in between being present also, just to try and base your ignorant argument upon it, really isn't very clever.
You have no clue as to where and what habitable zones intersect in outer space or how much they would need to, to allow known extremophiles or even microbes trapped within meteorites or comets to live and survive a journey. Let alone any that may not yet be known of.
As you won't like any facts that don't match what you want them to, why not just revert to form and make yet another pathetically silly picture of yourself wearing a dunce's hat and start photoshop-ing it again?
Quote from Trader666:
Quit trying to squirm off the hook, troll. You're the one who made this ridiculous claim so you tell me, which "extremeophiles" [sic] "live in environments" even remotely like outer space?
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=3301653#post3301653
Obviously -454F is the starting point, STUpid, because it's the temperature of the universe... and the extreme cold is so pervasive that galaxies have an average temperature of only a tiny fraction of a degree higher. Are you capable of understanding what that means in terms of what % of space is hospitable to known extremophiles? You clearly didn't know at the time you put your foot in your mouth.