Evolution debunked in 1 paragraph.

[Trader666]

Will you ever stop making a total fool of yourself?

Quote from STUpid:

The supernatural excludes itself from science simply because there is nothing scientific in evidence for anything supernatural.

Were some phenomena supernaturally caused, it's obvious science would, and only science could, be used to be able to reach the truth scientifically.

 

[bwolinsky]

Quote from Trader666:

Will you ever stop making a total fool of yourself?

That's hilarious, T. Not very well worded, is it?

So, who wants to talk about the comet with billions of gallons of water that hit the earth a few billion years ago?

If you don't watch David Wilcock's videos just know that the universe is a torsion field generator that produces organisms with cellular structures that use the double helix. Waves of energy pass throughout the galaxy and this causes small changes in our genetic code, giving rise to human thought and what I've been through more importantly, apotheosis.

 

[stu]

Quote from seneca_roman:

You might like Creationist Bingo:

No cash prizes but every player gets a new toy.

 

[jem]

Quote from RickTheMan:

Oh, yeah, and Jem, if you didn't "mean to be rude", then you wouldn't say or BE what you are considering as "rude". See the double-speak thing there?

Oh you figured it out Stu. ..

now explain how a rational person could make this quote..

"Some people have the ability and strength to understand that a higher power called GOD, doesn't exist, and can view the world through a lens that Nature has given us. Other people can't."

show us some fact which gives you the ability or strength to understand a higher power called GOD does not exist.

Any proof will do.

 

[bwolinsky]

Quote from jem:

Oh you figured out Stu. ..

now explain how a rational person could make this quote..

"Some people have the ability and strength to understand that a higher power called GOD, doesn't exist, and can view the world through a lens that Nature has given us. Other people can't."

show us some fact which gives you the ability or strength to understand a higher power called GOD does not exist.

Any proof will do.

When it comes to proving or disproving God does or does not exist, I always come back to Pascal's wager that it is better to be deceived than suffer the consequences of being wrong.

 

[jem]

Quote from bwolinsky:

As we have fossil records that show how humans once looked, I'm not going to argue with Mr. Darwin or God. What we have today is the culmination of millions of years of symbiosis, and most of that symbiosis has only been able to be explained today. Suggesting that because we cannot prove everything means there is a flaw in science isn't really the case, there is only a flaw in our rationality.

If you use what some theoretical physicists say is true, then the universe is many trillions of trillions of trillions of trillions of billions of years old. Not 14.5-14.8 billion. That may be how it has appeared since that time, but deep time really does explain a lot. And water with microbes impacting the earth's surface leaving water and bacteria behind is how we went from single cell amino acids to homo sapien.

A lot of these ideas are also based on superstition, and in the following link you'll see that not only can you produce "life" in a 1000 degree heated vacuum, but you can also see how experiments with these organisms have shown that the new organisms evolve or adapt.

http://www.youtube.com/user/BWolinsky?feature=mhee#p/c/08EF19FC8C3D9F13/0/cEyqT2_ricA

have they found any evidence of this pan spermia? I have been suggesting some biologists have said that life must have come from outerspace because there was not enough time for it to have evolved from earth... but Stu did not like that suggestion... he seemed to be insisting he knew it evolved here on earth.

 

[jem]

Quote from bwolinsky:

When it comes to proving or disproving God does or does not exist, I always come back to Pascal's wager that it is better to be deceived than suffer the consequences of being wrong.

My focus on this thread was to show what a crackpot stu has become.

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from jem:

My focus on this thread was to show what a crackpot stu has become.

Mission Accomplished!

 

[jem]

you are still doing it stu.
putting "actually" in front of your statement changes nothing.

Your statement was contrary to scientific fact. Contrasting it to the same statement with "actually" in front of it... does not change the crackpot nature of your statement.

a. There is plenty of science showing Stu is a troll.
b. There is actually plenty of science showing stu is a troll.

Conclusion.. there is "actually" no difference for the purposes of our discussion.

 

[murray t turtle]

Quote from fhl:

The atheists know deep down that science doesn't prove, nor does it "exclude the alternatives" that they hold so dear.

Thus, the necessity of silencing their opponents.
To keep them quiet.

Just look at any communist regime.
Or look at any institution in the US that is dominated by pinko commies. You see nothing more than operations to stamp out opposition.

First, they agitate to have guns taken away.
Then, they rewrite history.
Then, they silence opposition.

If you want to know the real reason, for gun control, forget what they say, just look at all history's example of what happens when guns are taken away by atheists.

Need further examples? How about the latest. Obama's new jobs creation speech. NPR published a transcript of the speech, of course deleting the sentence where Obama gaffed about Abraham Lincoln. In NPR's world, that sentence no longer exists.

And if their gun control were enacted, I wouldn't be allowed to reveal what they deleted it, either.

==============
Good points Fhl. And communists tend to have more guns than socialists.
But thats not an ad for socialists;
an old black Preacher called socialism ''a doctrine of demons'' Wonder if NPR will report that one also??