Evolution debunked in 1 paragraph.

[stu]

Quote from Trader666:

Wrong again! You can't even get your own story straight

Like all ridiculous things God can't be defined or reasoned into existence .
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=3269455#post3269455

Your flawed assumptions and logic are what is irrelevant... as is just about every STUpid post you make.

Are you so STUpid that you can only parrot my calls for you to get professional help and stop making a fool of yourself?

"No in fact you can't define god into existence."
Is what I said prior to your gaumless remark. At least try to get the actual quote straight.

...and Apart from ignoring them,throwing your own infantile comments right back is the most they're ever going to warrant.

 

[stu]

Quote from jem:

When someone is as disconnected from reality as Stu, is in wrong to correct him?
a·bi·o·gen·e·sis   [ey-bahy-oh-jen-uh-sis, ab-ee-oh-] Show IPA
noun Biology .
the now discredited theory that living organisms can arise spontaneously from inanimate matter; spontaneous generation.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/abiogenesis

--

Web definitions
a hypothetical organic phenomenon by which living organisms are created from nonliving matter
wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn
--
Definition of ABIOGENESIS
: the supposed spontaneous origination of living organisms directly from lifeless matter
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/abiogenesis

Its not just stu against against science, or stu against nobel prize winners, or stu against logic, it is stu against dictionaries again.

So now you've suddenly abandoned your own Nobel Prize winning example of science in the form of Dr Jack Szostak, for some totally non scientific entries in a couple of dictionaries.

I'll trump your subjective dictionary definitions, which have no basis in science whatsoever for http://ccib.mgh.harvard.edu/szostaklab.htm which does, and some more science where it is explained how abiogenesis is really more than a fully working highly advanced scientific hypothesis.

You've nowhere to go with this Jem but to display your moronity.
If life did not originate naturally from non living matter already in the Universe against all the empiric evidence that it will have done so , then you only have magic.
You could acknowledge the actual science in abiogenesis, and still pretend your magic creator God mysteriously and unexplainably fits in somewhere else.

That way you'll still be delusional, but at least more honest and delusional.

 

[bkveen3]

Stu,

Every knee will bow and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord. I pray that you come to this realization while you can still bow willingly. You'll be in my prayers. God willing I'll see you one day.

 

[Trader666]

You STUpid lying troll... even after I quoted your own words back to you, you're still trying to slime your way out of it

Quote from STUpid:

"No in fact you can't define god into existence."
Is what I said prior to your gaumless remark. At least try to get the actual quote straight.

The quote you cited above was your reply to DonerNDoner. Our discussion was specifically about whether or not God could be reasoned into or out of existence.

AFTER you wrote that quote to DonerNDoner, you wrote this to me:

Quote from STUpid:

Like all ridiculous things God can't be defined or reasoned into existence .

And AFTER I boxed you into a corner, you tried to lie your way out of it with this:

Quote from STUpid:

I said defined not reasoned.

You can't stop your lying, can you?

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from stu:

Careful now crummie .
You should just stick with staring at that stone you're waiting to turn to gold...

How long does that normally take anyway stewie? One billion years? Two? I suppose since it's purely random chance it could happen this week. I guess a really smart guy - would get a bigger rock. LOL

 

[jem]

Its odd you would quote szostak again considering he told you, you are dead ass wrong... When he said in 2009 there is no complete known pathway from non life to life.

Quote from stu:

So now you've suddenly abandoned your own Nobel Prize winning example of science in the form of Dr Jack Szostak, for some totally non scientific entries in a couple of dictionaries.

I'll trump your subjective dictionary definitions, which have no basis in science whatsoever for http://ccib.mgh.harvard.edu/szostaklab.htm which does, and some more science where it is explained how abiogenesis is really more than a fully working highly advanced scientific hypothesis.

You've nowhere to go with this Jem but to display your moronity.
If life did not originate naturally from non living matter already in the Universe against all the empiric evidence that it will have done so , then you only have magic.
You could acknowledge the actual science in abiogenesis, and still pretend your magic creator God mysteriously and unexplainably fits in somewhere else.

That way you'll still be delusional, but at least more honest and delusional.

your delusional

the first page of you post says this.

From fossil evidence, it appears that life may have existed on Earth as early as 3.5 billion years ago. This suggests that life must have evolved sometime during Earth's tumultuous first billion years. How did life evolve? And what did early forms of life look like? Some scientists believe that the answers may be hiding in our cells, in molecules known as RNA.

and from the third page...


From fossil evidence, it appears that life may have existed on Earth as early as 3.5 billion years ago. This suggests that life must have evolved sometime during Earth's tumultuous first billion years. How did life evolve? And what did early forms of life look like? Some scientists believe that the answers may be hiding in our cells, in molecules known as RNA.

Next: What's so special about RNA?


There is know known pathway. you are the moron or troll.

 

[stu]

Quote from Trader666:

You STUpid lying troll... even after I quoted your own words back to you, you're still trying to slime your way out of it

The quote you cited above was your reply to DonerNDoner. Our discussion was specifically about whether or not God could be reasoned into or out of existence.

AFTER you wrote that quote to DonerNDoner, you wrote this to me:

And AFTER I boxed you into a corner, you tried to lie your way out of it with this:

You can't stop your lying, can you?

Me to Donner:
You can't define God into existence

you chirp in with:
Nor can you "reason" God out of existence...

blindingly obviously then:
You can't reason something out of existence that cannot be reasoned in.

no surprise, here comes your next fatuous comment
God can't be reasoned into or out of existence


....all of which which, as it was said, only leaves God as an irrelevant, superfluous, pointless, non concept that cannot even be reasoned and certainly not defined into existence, in order to be reasoned or defined out. Just like any other futile idea.

Boxed in a corner you say?... yeah you're right. You boxed yourself right in there.

 

[stu]

Quote from Lucrum:

How long does that normally take anyway stewie? One billion years? Two? I suppose since it's purely random chance it could happen this week. I guess a really smart guy - would get a bigger rock. LOL

You know what crummie, that's exactly the type of damn silly thing a Creationist would say.
Are you going to out yourself soon?

 

[stu]

Quote from bkveen3:

Stu,

Every knee will bow and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord. I pray that you come to this realization while you can still bow willingly. You'll be in my prayers. God willing I'll see you one day.

bkveen3,

Kowtowing is not my style.
I just hope while you are submitting yourself to a self-serving ritual of subservience and superstition by praying to an imaginary tyrant, someone else is thinking for you.

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from stu:

You know what crummie, that's exactly the type of damn silly thing a Creationist would say.
Are you going to out yourself soon?

Well I did go "out" to check on my rock earlier. It's still just a rock though. Damn this random chance shit sure is slow. You'd think once in awhile by pure "random chance" it'd go quick.