Quote from stu:
Jem, either put up or shut up.
Where do I ever claim ..."science had plenty of proof for the evolution from non life to life ".... as you've falsely stated.
Oh and I'm truly sorry for using new words . Obviously any words which actually represent the science and which you have haven't changed or misrepresented will be new to you.
There are any number of advancements since Miller-Uray. You've been given many references but being ignorant of them, including not being bothered to check the right name, is essential to your position.
In fussing about abiogenesis like you are , you're essentially trying to suggest you accept there is such a thing as conception, but no matter what the science shows, it doesn't prove a child will be the outcome.
No matter how science explains how all the essential ingredients for life can form naturally from inorganic material, you don't consider life must be the outcome.
How absurd. What do you expect will be the outcome. Plastic effigies of jesus?
The link you made does nothing to support your false assertions.
Are you going to properly explain what the hell you are talking about or is this one of those creationist things where you think coming up with any bullshit is equivalent to proving something.
you must go through periods of atheist delusions..
you somehow keep denying that I present this link to you... and it is not the only only time I have showed you bullshiting on this subject.
Here is your quote Stroll...
"... But as an ID'er, you are of course all about misinformation, misrepresenting , misquoting and misunderstanding.
There is plenty of science showing life from non life.
But you've already overplayed the devious nature of your intention. You are not after any proof...."
this is the page:
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showt...62&perpage=6&highlight=pathway&pagenumber=124