Evolution debunked in 1 paragraph.

tradinglucy · Jul 22, 2011

True unless proven false?

Ok. How about I say I believe that the world was created 1000 years ago by a God who planted historical evidence dating back thousands and even millions of years?

Tell me why my God is fake and I'll shoot you down. I have to warn you though, I have this book that has all the documentation of his existence and I'll be taking all my evidence from there.

Quote from Trader666:

Never said you did. You wrote "The Christian god is no more real than Zeus or Thor" and I'm asking you to prove it. You keep huffing and puffing about staying on topic so go ahead and I'll tear it down.

Lucrum · Jul 22, 2011

Quote from stu:

Thing is the majority of your posts indicate you are no such thing.

ONLY because you arrogantly presume anyone who doesn't dutifully swallow the big bang, something from nothing, life from non life, macro evolution theories without any question must be a creationist.

Gabfly1 · Jul 22, 2011

Quote from Lucrum:

...blah, blah, blah...

Still waiting:

http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=3244023#post3244023

Lucrum · Jul 22, 2011

Quote from Gabfly1:

Really? "Undecided?" "Open mind?" Then what are some of your equal-opportunity criticisms regarding creationism?

No one I know of has seen or carried on a two way conversation with God?

Your as bad as stu-PID with your arrogant presumption that anyone who doesn't wholeheartedly embrace every anti-God theory is automatically a TV evangelist.

Gabfly1 · Jul 22, 2011

Quote from Lucrum:

No one I know of has seen or carried on a two way conversation with God?

Your as bad as stu-PID with your arrogant presumption that anyone who doesn't wholeheartedly embrace every anti-God theory is automatically a TV evangelist.

And so that's what makes evolution and creationism equivalent arguments in your eyes? I only see you spew crap against evolution. You seem very "circumspect" about attacking creationism with similar vigor.

Lucrum · Jul 22, 2011

Quote from Gabfly1:

And so that's what makes evolution and creationism equivalent arguments in your eyes?

I don't think they are equivalent arguments.

I only see you spew crap against evolution. You seem very "circumspect" about attacking creationism with similar vigor.

More...

You're an idiot liberal Gabby, which means by definition you see only want you want to see.

Gabfly1 · Jul 22, 2011

Quote from Lucrum:

I don't think they are equivalent arguments...

So then spell it out. Which is the better argument: evolution or creationism?

Quote from Lucrum:

...You're an idiot liberal Gabby, which means by definition you see only want you want to see.

Fine. I have already seen all your arguments against evolution. Now let me see some of your arguments against creationism that I have been willfully ignoring by your account, "seeing only what I want to see." Show me just how "open minded" you are. Please provide the links to these posts of yours that I have been so willfully ignoring.

Lucrum · Jul 22, 2011

Quote from shortie:

some people are unlucky to have PMS 28 to 31 days per month. some compassion would be nice.

You seem to have first hand experience, your PMS or your sister/wife's?

Lucrum · Jul 22, 2011

Quote from Gabfly1:

So then spell it out. Which is the better argument: evolution or creationism?

I see it as "arguments"(as in theories, speculation, conjecture, beliefs, faiths, evidence subject to interpretation...) for two entirely different, yet possibly intertwined, scenarios.

Fine. I have alreay seen all your arguments against evolution. Now let me see some of your arguments against creationism that I have been willfully ignoring by your account, "seeing only what I want to see." Show me just how "open minded" you are. Please provide the links to these posts of yours that I have been so willfully ignoring.

More...

I "question" macro evolution, life from non life and something from nothing theories more because I know less about them. And frankly some of them are IMO no less far fetched than creationism. I grew up in church,(as I've admitted previously) I already know all the bible stories.

Gabfly1 · Jul 22, 2011

Quote from Lucrum:

I see it as "arguments"(as in theories, speculation, conjecture, beliefs, faiths, evidence subject to interpretation...) for two entirely different, yet possibly intertwined, scenarios.

I "question" macro evolution, life from non life and something from nothing theories more because I know less about them. I grew up in church,(as I've admitted previously) I already know all the bible stories.

You don't seem to question the veracity of these "bible stories" here anywhere near as much as you question the scientific evidence supporting evolution, do you?

As for the evolution and creationist "arguments," you conceded earlier that they are not equivalent. Which one, then, do you find more compelling, and supported by some (I would say "ample") evidence as compared to none at all?