Evolution debunked in 1 paragraph.

[Hansel H]

Quote from peilthetraveler:

Stu doesnt like it when you use his own words against him.

Not to worry.. Stu will come back with a good rejoinder.

 

[Trader666]

What's really sad is you desperately stumbling over yourself with STUpidity like this in support of your atheist beliefs
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=3238040#post3238040

Quote from STUpid:

Desperately trying to make room for your religious beliefs like that is rather sad.

 

[MakeNoMistake]

Quote from Hansel H:

Hi, Stu..

So the universe is everything we call god.

If the universe is everything we call god then what we call god is included in the universe. If the universe exists then everything included in the universe exists therefore what we call god exists.

God as universe, universe as god.

Except the real universe can't make a woman magically pregnant.

 

[jem]

Quote from stu:

So the proof, the fact, that the building blocks of life themselves can and are formed naturally by chemical reaction from inorganic material, is beside the point?

Hard evidence for 'life from non-life' ....and it is beside the point.?

The next questions following from that knowledge is where the proof and fact and hard evidence is still being discovered.

But then that's all you can do isn't it. Prevaricate around the things yet to be discovered and dismiss all the things that are. Desperately trying to make room for your religious beliefs like that is rather sad.

I just gave you a paper from MIT which sums everything up and you still write this shit?

you stated you have proof that non life became life on earth...

that paper just summed up the last few decades of research on the subject.

try educating yourself and stop being such a troll.

you were wrong... its okay we still think the same way of you.

 

[Hansel H]

Quote from MakeNoMistake:

Except the real universe can't make a woman magically pregnant.

I'm not suggesting the possibility of that sort of universe/god.

If I were the first thing I'd point out is that your statement can be fairly converted to an arbitrary definition:"A real universe is one in which pregnancy can't be magical.". Even if you're careful with your definitions you may find untenable arguing that in all possible worlds reality necessarily disallows magic of any kind including magical pregnancy.

 

[Trader666]

It would be a lot easier than magically blipping itself into existence from nothing.

Quote from MakeNoMistake:

Except the real universe can't make a woman magically pregnant.

 

[stu]

Quote from Hansel H:

Hi, Stu..

So the universe is everything we call god.

If the universe is everything we call god then what we call god is included in the universe. If the universe exists then everything included in the universe exists therefore what we call god exists.

God as universe, universe as god.

Hey Hansel,
nice to hear from you after so long.

Would you please be good enough to read again what I said before re-interpreting my words to say something they don't.

If the universe is everything we call god then what we call god is included in the universe.
No.
The universe is everything you call god, then what you call god is actually the universe.

 

[stu]

Quote from jem:

I just gave you a paper from MIT which sums everything up and you still write this shit?

you stated you have proof that non life became life on earth...

that paper just summed up the last few decades of research on the subject.

try educating yourself and stop being such a troll.

you were wrong... its okay we still think the same way of you.

You're still squirming. No change there.

The fundamental single undivided FACT is that all of life's building blocks, the necessities of life, can come and do occur from inorganic material.

You can cut & paste all the papers you want to do with showing, speculating, theorizing, scientifically explaining how that could have happened,as you continually try to misrepresent the actual situation, that's a different issue altogether.

But you cannot squeeze your God in the place where nature already managed to produce the essentials for 'life from non-life' all by itself.

 

[jem]

Quote from stu:

You're still squirming. No change there.

The fundamental single undivided FACT is that all of life's building blocks, the necessities of life, can come and do occur from inorganic material.

You can cut & paste all the papers you want to do with showing, speculating, theorizing, scientifically explaining how that could have happened,as you continually try to misrepresent the actual situation, that's a different issue altogether.

But you cannot squeeze your God in the place where nature already managed to produce the essentials for 'life from non-life' all by itself.

I hope everyone is smart enough to see what a troll you are.

building blocks - are not what makes things alive. Of course life has core components... that proves nothing. you are just using words to change the focus. frankenstein was a body until mary shelly animated him.

you have building blocks, but you have no proof of a pathway of those inorganic materials evolving into life.

you said you have proof of life from no life.

there is not a single credible scientist in the world who makes that statement.

In fact if you read the MIT article you see that few or no scientists believe they have proof that the inorganic materials turned into life by chance. And some rule out chance.

its you vs. science.

that is the issue you say not only that life evolved from inorganic materials by chance, but you say you have proof.

You are a fool and your prove it with every post on this thread.

 

[Big Kahuna]

Quote from stu:

You're still squirming. No change there.

The fundamental single undivided FACT is that all of life's building blocks, the necessities of life, can come and do occur from inorganic material.

Who put them all together in precisely the right combination eh?