Evolution debunked in 1 paragraph.

[Trader666]

More bullshit. Ice core samples show the earth has gone through regular warming cycles since way before man had any ability to influence them. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Vostok_Petit_data.svg So anyone not questioning MMGW is naive.

Also, here's a link to a 255 page Senate report that has since been updated with over 1000 scientists so don't even pretend it's unreasonable to question it.

U. S. Senate Minority Report:
More Than 700 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming
Claims Scientists Continue to Debunk “Consensus” in 2008 & 2009
http://epw.senate.gov/public/index....Store_id=83947f5d-d84a-4a84-ad5d-6e2d71db52d9

On evolution, I wrote the following:

I have no doubt there's an evolutionary process. Forget fossils -- the continuous adaptation of increasingly drug-resistant "super bugs" alone more than makes the case. BUT how it all started and whether or not intelligent design was involved, NOBODY KNOWS.
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/reply.php

Your boy Dawkins reluctantly admitted in the video to what I wrote in the final sentence so once again you're full of crap.

Quote from Gayfly:

Climate change. Evolution. The saga continues.

 

[jem]

Quote from Kassz007:



Puhlease! This, coming from the king of quote mining.

quote mining suggests the quotes I use are taken out of context. show me a quote I have used out of context.

 

[Trader666]

You idiot! The post shows without question that you had no understanding of the composition of the universe until I schooled you on it. But keep pretending and lying and maybe you'll actually get someone as STUpid as you to believe your BS

Quote from STUpid:

Lol.
The only smoking gun is the one you shot yourself in the foot with when you made that post containing your ill-informed hysterical comments.

You made mistakes, they've been fully pointed out to you, yet still after months and months you can't come to terms with them.

All you can do is keep repeating the same post over and over. Your mistakes in it aren't going away just because you think they aren't there every time you link the thing.

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from Gabfly1:

Read a fucking book on the subject of evolution ...

What happens if I happen to read a fucking book on the subject that disagrees with the theory of evolution? Do I dutifully discard it as you would?

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from stu:

... their idea that gravity, like evolution, is ONLY a theory too.

I have and can repeatedly observe gravity. I haven't observed any inert space dust suddenly coming to life.

 

[Trader666]

There are only theories of gravity, STUpid, and none of them fully explains it. And that's a fact.

Quote from STUpid:

What ever world it is ET's anti-science creationists are in, Elvis will be there as well.
While being fully immersed themselves in the science which enables the transmitting of data at the speed of light, although of course the scientific wherewithal to do it is based on ONLY a theory, they might have more chance convincing The King of their idea that gravity, like evolution, is ONLY a theory too.

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from Gabfly1:

...But until then, you don't even know what the questions are.

Here's a question, why was your mother not pro choice?

 

[jem]

Quote from stu:

What ever world it is ET's anti-science creationists are in, Elvis will be there as well.
While being fully immersed themselves in the science which enables the transmitting of data at the speed of light, although of course the scientific wherewithal to do it is based on ONLY a theory, they might have more chance convincing The King of their idea that gravity, like evolution, is ONLY a theory too.

another example of the atheist pretending science on their side. you are the anti science person here.

Here is your chance show us where Dawkins was wrong or taken out of context

show us the misrepresentation... show us the out of context use.. . show us that science agrees with you. -- show us the pathway from life to non life...

just once... i would like one of you clowns... to show us some atheist science... show us that life evolved from non life...

did you notice dawkins suggested pan spermia..... do you know why?

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from Gabfly1:

Oh yeah, and that's an old joke.

Hence the reason I mentioned it, your age.

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from Gabfly1:

That boat has sailed. It IS fact for all intents and purposes.

You mean YOUR purposes.

Again, you do dispute yet do not understand the definition of "scientific theory"

Apparently the scientific community has changed the definition of theory. I assume so they don't have to admit their theories are...well...theories.