Evolution debunked in 1 paragraph.

Gabfly1 · Jun 28, 2011

Quote from Trader666:

Like your hypothesis that there is no God?

No, like YOUR hypothesis that there IS one. You can't prove a negative. However, YOU'RE the one with the affirmative assertion, therefore, the onus is on you. The person rejecting an assertion does not need to bring anything to the table. It is the asserter who has to show his homework.

On the other hand, the affirmative assertion of evolution has all manner of evidence supporting it. Evolution does not require a god, therefore, one is not asserted.

Once again, you have the answer without even understanding the question.

Trader666 · Jun 28, 2011

Wrong again. Some negatives can absolutely be proven. Your "knowledge" of logic is severely lacking.

Weak attempt at obfuscating your way out of your earlier gaffe but do you "think" the nonexistence of God is "completely unfalsifiable" or not? Yes or no? If you say yes, then based on your "logic" below it does in fact follow that it's "as weak a hypothesis as you can get."

A hypothesis is as weak as it is unfalsifiable. The god argument is completely unfalsifiable, therefore, from a thinking person's perspective it is as weak a hypothesis as you can get.

Quote from Gayfly:

You can't prove a negative.

Gabfly1 · Jun 28, 2011

Hey, TGregg, doesn't it make you feel warm all over that Trader666 is one of yours, and that there are so many more just like him? (Politically speaking.)

Lucrum · Jun 28, 2011

Quote from Gabfly1:

Hey, TGregg, doesn't it make you feel warm all over that Trader666 is one of yours? (Politically speaking.)

I share many of your views on marketsurfer, so what does that mean?

Gabfly1 · Jun 28, 2011

Quote from Lucrum:

I share many of your views on marketsurfer, so what does that mean?

That you're "evolving?" Be patient. These things take time.

Trader666 · Jun 28, 2011

It means he has zero understanding of logic so must resort to trolling.

Quote from Lucrum:

I share many of your views on marketsurfer, so what does that mean?

Gabfly1 · Jun 28, 2011

Quote from Trader666:

It means he has zero understanding of logic so must resort to trolling.

The important thing is that your grasp of "logic" is what has brought you, and so many others just like you, to the Right side of the political aisle. It says so much.

Lucrum · Jun 28, 2011

Quote from Gabfly1:

That you're "evolving?"

I thought we were all evolving.

Quote from Trader666:

It means he has zero understanding of logic so must resort to trolling.

Admittedly I've never been impressed with Gabby's "logic".

Trader666 · Jun 28, 2011

I rest my case.

P.S. Tell us again how "you can't prove a negative." Or how your "concept" of falsifiability only applies to what you want it to

Quote from Gayfly:

The important thing is that your grasp of "logic" is what has brought you, and so many others just like you, to the Right side of the political aisle. It says so much.

jem · Jun 28, 2011

i no longer understand the arguments of people like gabfly.

if you are saying that you are now now confining your argument to the argument that once life appeared... life evolved somewhat..

no arguments from me. that is my position too.

Just don't pretend that you have scientific proof for your argument that life evolved from non life here on earth.

as for the evolutionists selective quote mining from darwin... I do not get you argument.... what is it that you say darwin stands for?

finally - I am not sure why anyone would quote dawkins... he has admitted the universe and life could have been created