Evolution debunked in 1 paragraph.

Quote from stu:

The problem with that is, with science, true science, you have to support assertions with hard empiric evidence. Just saying they have 'plausible SCIENTIFIC explanations' isn't necessarily science.

There is no real scientific evidence to support any of the things you've mentioned. If you merely re-interpret the plagues of Egypt and the parting of the "Red Sea" into some adaptations of natural events, at best you simply have inaccurate diary notes, not a Bible.

There is no such evidence of Sodom and Gomorrah , parting of the Red Sea or the Garden of Eden. They are tales in a story book.
On that level you do realize the story of Goldilocks could be shown to have 'plausible SCIENTIFIC explanations'. ? Just find three porridge bowls from around the time of the tale in an archeological dig and, hey presto.


If you understand science at all, you understand not to dutifully believe anything.

If you choose to accept evidence that isn't there and deny evidence that is there , you dutifully believe in fantasy.

The thing with something from nothing theory , it is based on science itself, not on a fantastical story, and more compellingly in view of its suggestion, doesn't contravene the laws of physics.

There is no dutiful belief required. Science based knowledge and understanding will verify, or something from nothing will remain evidentially possible but scientifically inconclusive.

Whereas things like God just don’t get to be scientific at all.
More...

Translation: stu only believes what bolsters his preconceived notions and ignores all else.
 
Quote from Lucrum:

Translation: stu only believes what bolsters his preconceived notions and ignores all else.
More...

Someone whose beliefs lean against preconceived notions ignoring all else, would make a comment like that.
 
Quote from stu:

People who believe in a Creator ARE believing in things contrary to scientific understanding. There is NO science in any propositions for a Creator. Constantly trying to suggest otherwise is just farcical.

All you ever do is invent your own versions of what you consider is current scientific understanding, to infer possibilities for a God.
Why can't you just be content to rely on blind belief to support your religion , instead of constantly misrepresenting scientific understanding, which you obviously don't understand .

ET theists start threads like this one, to say science is wrong so therefore God. That's what the OP does.

To point out the shear folly and factual incorrectness of that statement, is immediately and unjustifiably turned into any number of groundless accusations, including one of having a 'dutiful belief' in science.

The anti-science theist argument goes; if religion is daft, make a daft comment about science, now science is as daft as religion, so religion is no dafter than science.

The only understanding a religious protagonist like yourself appears to ever want is one that proposes any absurd religious statement is as valid as any refutation of it.
All the ridiculous posts you've made to belie science, are all some version of the above.
More...

Since pointing out your arguments were contrary to science
your atheist rants are now amorphous.
 
It doesn't make any sense that a "Creator" deity would leave it to followers of various religions which contradict each other to convince the human race of its existence.
 
Quote from jem:

Since pointing out your arguments were contrary to science
your atheist rants are now amorphous.
More...
In your dreams, as usual.

I understand that, like Lucrum and the rest of your bunch, you are only going to be capable of making false assertions which you think is a form of argument.
That apparently, is the best you'll do.
 
Quote from Betapeg:

It doesn't make any sense that a "Creator" deity would leave it to followers of various religions which contradict each other to convince the human race of its existence.
More...

Allah is to God as Zeus is to God.

To Christians, what is the difference between modern Hindi Gods and ancient Greek Gods? There are/were whole populations who believed that they were real. Yet you discount them. Why is your God the one true God and all others false?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top