evolution: 1 creationism: 0

Read the WSJ, 2-13-04 p. B1 , for an interesting article that shows holes in the "irreducible complexity" argument.

Antievolutionists like to use the pickled example that a cell's liklihood of emerging without ID is similar to a tornado sweeping down on a complete set of parts of a 747 jet and assembling them into the functional airline. No doubt these calculations were based on dubious assumptions.

Parts of cells, cellular subcomponents appear and reappear in various species, evidencing evolution at work.
 
Oh oh... looks like you have a personal stalker now too :D
Pathetic isnt it?

peace

axeman



Quote from Sardo_Numspa:

Are you going to follow me all over ET like an obsessed schoolgirl?
 
Quote from AAAintheBeltway:

What is so threatening about exposing students to different theories? Evolution is a theory, not fact. There is no proof for it. Teaching evolution as if it were an established fact is misleading and ignorant. I think students should be taught the concepts of evolution but also shown the holes in it and the reasoning of those who believe in intelligent design.

Come on AAA, you're smarter than that. To allow 'creationism' to be taught in the classroom is to start a descent into intellectual corruption. DUMB!

Let em teach it in Sunday school.

Irma
 
Back
Top