li·a·bil·i·ty
noun
Probably the number one intra-biblical evidence of it's liability is Jesus' own opinion about the predominant Jewish (or priest-class) genesis narrative of his day. During an argument with certain of the priests, lawyers, and/or scribes, they boasted of their long blood line. Jesus suggested that if they traced their blood line back far enough, they would discover they were the sons of the devil. He doubled down on this when he followed up, telling them that the devil was a liar "since the beginning". Jesus tripled down when he said, "Before Abraham was, I AM".
Unpacking this, let me first interpret what he meant by "since the beginning". Up to that point, the priest class was tracing their bloodline further and further toward the beginning of their "scriptures" (official narratives used to control the largest number of people with the smallest police force). They were tracing their bloodline back to the formation (from the dust of nothingness) of "Adam", the first man. In this way, they were implying they were the sons of God, as the narrative implies Adam was the son of God. Jesus flat contradicts this, saying Adam was the son of the devil. He reinforces this idea by saying that the very first sentence of their official narrative, "IN THE BEGINNING...", was a lie. In his saying "since THE BEGINNING" (referencing the first sentence of the official narrative), Jesus was also saying that everything following the first sentence was also a lie. This would include their cherished bloodlines.
Finally, Jesus skipped all the stupid bloodlines and placed his origins squarely in the domain of the eternal, before there was ever anything believed to be a "beginning". He insisted he existed before any of the bloodlines they were boasting of relations. Jesus was saying he was not begotten of any man, neither Abraham, nor Adam, for to be so begotten would make him the son of some kind of lie, and/or liar (the "devil"). Being "the truth", he was born "without beginning and without end", in the realm of the eternal. This is further corroborated in some mysterious passage where Jesus status is likened to that of Melchezedek, who was said to have had no beginning (or end), at least as far as the official narrative goes. While Melchezedek may have had a bloodline, at least none is mentioned, making him unique in a narrative that gives so much weight to bloodlines.
In these revelations, Jesus puts the Bible squarely at odds with anyone emerging out of the realm of the eternal (the realm/domain of Good) . Further, any fledgling philosopher (lover of wisdom) should be able to grok, that time and the eternal are mutually exclusive concepts. As such, the eternal cannot beget time as if it could be the father of time. Time is contrary to what is eternal. This is because time is fundamentally the measurement and/or observation of change, while the eternal does not change, being "the same yesterday, today, and forever" so to speak. Change-less-ness (what does not changer) does not father change (what changes), just as one man cannot ride two horses, or just as blessing and cursing cannot come from the same mouth (according to James).
This means there is a difference between the Good of eternity, and the "god" of time. The god of time is something quite contradictory to the Good of eternity. If the Good of eternity is "the truth", then the god of time must be some kind of lie, and/or liar. This is corroborated by yet another mysterious passage in the bible which states that the god of this world (a world of time, and world with a beginning) is "the devil". Only time has a "beginning". But if time is contrary to eternity, then any beginning must be some kind of lie.
This is the best intra-biblical evidence of it's own illegitimacy. The fact that this is intra-biblical says that the Bible's biggest liability is it's own internal contradictions. There are two different gospels contained therein. One is dominant over the other. The gospel of Jesus is still buried under mounds of "context", which is the official narrative of the Jewish priest-class. The gospel is/was buried with those like Stephen, buried under a pile of stones, with the apostate Paul helping. Paul, himself trained under Gamaliel, chief priest (per his own boasting) continues to help bury the gospel with one of his own: a variation of Gamaliel's own Pharisaical traditions. To the degree they mostly follow Paul, today's Christian's have become neo-Pharisees, still lauding their official narratives, still going against anyone claiming the eternal as their beginning-less genesis. This is precisely because the sons of time are at enmity of the sons of the eternal, just as the flesh is at enmity with the spirit.
noun
- a person or thing whose presence or behavior is likely to cause embarrassment or put one at a disadvantage.
Probably the number one intra-biblical evidence of it's liability is Jesus' own opinion about the predominant Jewish (or priest-class) genesis narrative of his day. During an argument with certain of the priests, lawyers, and/or scribes, they boasted of their long blood line. Jesus suggested that if they traced their blood line back far enough, they would discover they were the sons of the devil. He doubled down on this when he followed up, telling them that the devil was a liar "since the beginning". Jesus tripled down when he said, "Before Abraham was, I AM".
Unpacking this, let me first interpret what he meant by "since the beginning". Up to that point, the priest class was tracing their bloodline further and further toward the beginning of their "scriptures" (official narratives used to control the largest number of people with the smallest police force). They were tracing their bloodline back to the formation (from the dust of nothingness) of "Adam", the first man. In this way, they were implying they were the sons of God, as the narrative implies Adam was the son of God. Jesus flat contradicts this, saying Adam was the son of the devil. He reinforces this idea by saying that the very first sentence of their official narrative, "IN THE BEGINNING...", was a lie. In his saying "since THE BEGINNING" (referencing the first sentence of the official narrative), Jesus was also saying that everything following the first sentence was also a lie. This would include their cherished bloodlines.
Finally, Jesus skipped all the stupid bloodlines and placed his origins squarely in the domain of the eternal, before there was ever anything believed to be a "beginning". He insisted he existed before any of the bloodlines they were boasting of relations. Jesus was saying he was not begotten of any man, neither Abraham, nor Adam, for to be so begotten would make him the son of some kind of lie, and/or liar (the "devil"). Being "the truth", he was born "without beginning and without end", in the realm of the eternal. This is further corroborated in some mysterious passage where Jesus status is likened to that of Melchezedek, who was said to have had no beginning (or end), at least as far as the official narrative goes. While Melchezedek may have had a bloodline, at least none is mentioned, making him unique in a narrative that gives so much weight to bloodlines.
In these revelations, Jesus puts the Bible squarely at odds with anyone emerging out of the realm of the eternal (the realm/domain of Good) . Further, any fledgling philosopher (lover of wisdom) should be able to grok, that time and the eternal are mutually exclusive concepts. As such, the eternal cannot beget time as if it could be the father of time. Time is contrary to what is eternal. This is because time is fundamentally the measurement and/or observation of change, while the eternal does not change, being "the same yesterday, today, and forever" so to speak. Change-less-ness (what does not changer) does not father change (what changes), just as one man cannot ride two horses, or just as blessing and cursing cannot come from the same mouth (according to James).
This means there is a difference between the Good of eternity, and the "god" of time. The god of time is something quite contradictory to the Good of eternity. If the Good of eternity is "the truth", then the god of time must be some kind of lie, and/or liar. This is corroborated by yet another mysterious passage in the bible which states that the god of this world (a world of time, and world with a beginning) is "the devil". Only time has a "beginning". But if time is contrary to eternity, then any beginning must be some kind of lie.
This is the best intra-biblical evidence of it's own illegitimacy. The fact that this is intra-biblical says that the Bible's biggest liability is it's own internal contradictions. There are two different gospels contained therein. One is dominant over the other. The gospel of Jesus is still buried under mounds of "context", which is the official narrative of the Jewish priest-class. The gospel is/was buried with those like Stephen, buried under a pile of stones, with the apostate Paul helping. Paul, himself trained under Gamaliel, chief priest (per his own boasting) continues to help bury the gospel with one of his own: a variation of Gamaliel's own Pharisaical traditions. To the degree they mostly follow Paul, today's Christian's have become neo-Pharisees, still lauding their official narratives, still going against anyone claiming the eternal as their beginning-less genesis. This is precisely because the sons of time are at enmity of the sons of the eternal, just as the flesh is at enmity with the spirit.
