Evidence of Collusion

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/a...-have-the-right-point-of-view/article/2628922

Alan Dershowitz: New York Times ignoring me because 'I don't have the right point of view'

"I said that I thought the readers of the New York Times were entitled to hear or read the other side of the issue whether there were crimes committed," said Dershowitz, a professor emeritus of Harvard Law School. "And I really do think The New York Times does not want its readers to hear an alternative point of view on the issue of whether or not Trump administration is committing crimes."
 
WeToddDid2 said:
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/a...-have-the-right-point-of-view/article/2628922

Alan Dershowitz: New York Times ignoring me because 'I don't have the right point of view'

"I said that I thought the readers of the New York Times were entitled to hear or read the other side of the issue whether there were crimes committed," said Dershowitz, a professor emeritus of Harvard Law School. "And I really do think The New York Times does not want its readers to hear an alternative point of view on the issue of whether or not Trump administration is committing crimes."
More...
When Jeffrey Epstein was asked during his deposition, “’Have you ever socialized with Alan Dershowitz in the presence of females under the age of 18?” he invoked his Fifth Amendment right not to answer in order to avoid self-incrimination.

Epstein also pled the Fifth when asked the same question regarding celebrity property developer Donald Trump

How Alan Dershowitz bullied rape victims to protect a serial child molester

https://electronicintifada.net/blog...ed-rape-victims-protect-serial-child-molester
 
WeToddDid2 said:
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/a...-have-the-right-point-of-view/article/2628922

Alan Dershowitz: New York Times ignoring me because 'I don't have the right point of view'

"I said that I thought the readers of the New York Times were entitled to hear or read the other side of the issue whether there were crimes committed," said Dershowitz, a professor emeritus of Harvard Law School. "And I really do think The New York Times does not want its readers to hear an alternative point of view on the issue of whether or not Trump administration is committing crimes."
More...


Dershowitz is just auditioning to get a job defending Trump.He has no problem defending guilty millionaires and billionaires like OJ,Trump, and his pedo pal Epstein if the money is right.
 
exGOPer said:
The New York Times just released a major news story this afternoon providing additional details about the previously undisclosed meeting that Donald Trump Jr., Paul Manafort, and Jared Kushner held at Trump Tower with a Kremlin-connected Russian lawyer shortly after Donald Trump clinched the Republican nomination.

According to three White House advisers briefed on the meeting and tow other who have knowledge of it, Trump Jr. was promised information damaging to Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.


As the Times noted, this could provide the first real proof of direct collusion between members of Trump’s circle and the Russians when it comes to election interference:


The meeting — at Trump Tower on June 9, 2016, two weeks after Donald J. Trump clinched the Republican nomination — points to the central question in federal investigations of the Kremlin’s meddling in the presidential election: whether the Trump campaign colluded with the Russians. The accounts of the meeting represent the first public indication that at least some in the campaign were willing to accept Russian help.

Per the report, it is still unclear whether the lawyer, Natalia Veselnitskaya, actually provided the dirt that she promised to Trump Jr. However, the expectation was she would have the information with her when she arrived at the July meeting.

http://www.mediaite.com/online/bomb...illary-clinton-before-russian-lawyer-meeting/
More...
How did that work out for you?
 
exGOPer said:
You may have missed the law, simply taking the meeting is ILLEGAL because it would be an offer of an in-kind donation to Trump's campaign, read up on the law I posted earlier.

And Times failed about what? What was taken out of context, be specific.
More...
How did that work out for you?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top