Evidence of Collusion

which is why I said present the links. You really need to step up the integrity.

You know damn well that post was said in fun and it was on the same page as this post.
The template I chose for pretty much the entire thread that year - projected an Obama victory...




"as I posted on another thread... here is my summary of this thread.


polls slanted greater to the Dems than the 2008 the template are leftist frauds... and they should be chastised. This will include the crazy predictions made by nate silver.

polls with the 2008 template are leftists, fools, or blind.
even axelrod said last night they will not do as well as 2008.

poll between 2010 and 2008 are professional... perhaps a little partisan as they get closer to 2008.

polls with 2010... are perhaps a bit partisan to the Rs but smart.


but IMO

polls should slanted more to the Is and the Rs because that is what the turnout on Tuesday will teach us.

all these pollsters... underweighted the Is."

2. that other quote was written in 2009. Many Many times after I explained this...


https://www.elitetrader.com/et/thre...ld-adeposea-obama.234014/page-50#post-3444199

"I told you and your loon friends there would be a hearing this issue. you all said never. My prediction was proven accurate.

There was a hearing... Obama defaulted instead of presenting proof of eligibility to be President. All he would had to do was present your beloved birth certificate from HI under oath. He chose to default. If that makes you feel good, you have a warped sense of the rule of law or patriotism."






"jem will then return home, grab a beer and watch as the the media
explains this surprise Romney victory..."-jem



image.jpg





"When Obama can't qualify for the ballot in a bunch of states - it will be hillary vs palin."-jem


image.jpg
 
Last edited:
"as I posted on another thread... here is my summary of this thread.


polls slanted greater to the Dems than the 2008 the template are leftist frauds... and they should be chastised. This will include the crazy predictions made by nate silver.

polls with the 2008 template are leftists, fools, or blind.
even axelrod said last night they will not do as well as 2008.

poll between 2010 and 2008 are professional... perhaps a little partisan as they get closer to 2008.

polls with 2010... are perhaps a bit partisan to the Rs but smart.


but IMO

polls should slanted more to the Is and the Rs because that is what the turnout on Tuesday will teach us.

all these pollsters... underweighted the Is."

2. that other quote was written in 2009. Many Many times after I explained this...


https://www.elitetrader.com/et/thre...ld-adeposea-obama.234014/page-50#post-3444199

"I told you and your loon friends there would be a hearing this issue. you all said never. My prediction was proven accurate.

There was a hearing... Obama defaulted instead of presenting proof of eligibility to be President. All he would had to do was present your beloved birth certificate from HI under oath. He chose to default. If that makes you feel good, you have a warped sense of the rule of law or patriotism."


"4. I stated I was wrong about the polls."-jem


image.jpg
 
Last edited:
52 U.S.C. 30121:

It shall be unlawful for (1) a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make (A) a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation.
Oh, then the Trump dossier is illegal.
 

http://www.breitbart.com/big-journa...times-russian-lawyer-meeting-story-fake-news/

Someone allegedly offered opposition research to the campaign — something that happens all the time, as the Clinton campaign knew well, since it was digging up dirt on Donald Trump anywhere it thought it could find it, including foreign sources.

The Times called the lawyer “Kremlin-connected,” but there is no reason that the Trump team would have suspected that (and the lawyer herself appeared to deny any such connection in the Times article).
 
Last edited:
It's not the specific meeting that's important. It's the number of shady touchpoints involving high level Russian people. Especially as they relate to this election. And then the Trump administration is constantly found lying about them.
 
Back
Top