Evidence for Election Fraud in the 2020 Presidential Election

[gwb-trading]

Jenna Ellis admits the election wasn't rigged to a disciplinary committee, paving the way for her to appear on all the right-wing news shows and talk about how it was rigged.

Trump 2020 lawyer admits misrepresenting stolen election claims
Jenna Ellis made the admissions in a Colorado disciplinary proceeding.
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/03/08/trump-lawyer-misrepresented-jenna-ellis-00086256

Jenna Ellis, an attorney for Donald Trump who helped drive his false claims about the 2020 election results, has admitted in a Colorado disciplinary proceeding that she misrepresented evidence at least 10 times during Trump’s frantic bid to subvert his defeat.

“Respondent made these misrepresentations on Twitter and on various television programs, including Fox Business, MSNBC, Fox News, and Newsmax,” Colorado’s top disciplinary judge Bryon Large wrote in a six-page opinion. “The parties agree that by making these misrepresentations, Respondent violated [a state attorney rule of conduct], which provides that it is professional misconduct for a lawyer to engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation.”

Large issued a public censure of Ellis for her stipulated conduct.

Ellis is the latest Trump attorney involved in the former president’s post-election efforts to face discipline. Rudy Giuliani had his license temporarily suspended and is awaiting a final ruling from a bar discipline proceeding in Washington, D.C. John Eastman is preparing for disciplinary proceedings in California. And Jeffrey Clark has temporarily delayed bar discipline proceedings against him in Washington while attempting to bring the fight into federal court.

But Ellis is the first attorney of the group to acknowledge she misrepresented the evidence of fraud. Among her admitted misrepresentations:

— Ellis claimed on Nov. 13, 2020 that Hillary Clinton didn’t concede the 2016 election.

— On Nov 20, 2020, Ellis claimed Trump’s team had evidence of a “coordinated effort in all of these states to transfer votes either from Trump to Biden, to manipulate the ballots, to count them in secret.”

— On Nov. 30, 2020, Ellis said on Fox that Trump “won in a landslide.”

— On Dec. 5, 2020, Ellis claimed the Trump team found 500,000 illegal votes had been cast in Arizona.

Both Ellis’ attorney and the disciplinary attorneys bringing the case against her agreed that there was no precedent for the case against Ellis — an effort to aid a sitting president’s bid to undermine confidence in the American election system.

Large noted that Ellis wasn’t Trump’s counsel of record in any lawsuits challenging the election. But he also noted that Ellis admitted her actions violated “her duty of candor to the public.”

“The parties agree that two aggravators apply — [Ellis] had a selfish motive and she engaged in a pattern of misconduct — while one factor, her lack of prior discipline, mitigates her misconduct,” Large determined.

Maybe Jenna Ellis should be careful around steps after admitting in an open session that the claims of election fraud are completely false.

Former Trump Lawyer Jenna Ellis Mocks McConnell’s Hospitalization With Video of Turtle Falling Down Stairs
https://www.mediaite.com/online/for...ion-with-video-of-turtle-falling-down-stairs/

 

[Cuddles]

 

[Tony Stark]

This thread is intended to list and discuss the evidence of election fraud in the 2020 US Presidential election. I encourage posters to focus on evidence related content either bolstering the argument for election fraud or tearing down the evidence presented.

Although there are many sources of information that list evidence, I will be basing most of my content from a Civil Complaint filed on behalf of the Trump Campaign in the state of Georgia and following up with some research of corroborating sources of my own.

The Complaint:

https://justthenews.com/sites/default/files/2020-11/COMPLAINT-CJ-PEARSON-V.-KEMP-11.25.2020.pdf



Below is a link from a substantial source for counterarguing the case of election fraud:

https://www.cisa.gov/rumorcontrol

I will point out, however, a prominent electronic voting industry expert has his own counterpoints to the information presented by cisa.gov, above. More on that to follow.


Anyway, off to enjoy the holidays for now and I hope all others here will do the same.

Do you still believe this bullshit?

 

[gwb-trading]

 

[BeautifulStranger]

Do you still believe this bullshit?

A couple of days ago I felt compelled to do some research on the various electronic voting machine companies. I found there is a long history of security and transparency issues, including the ability to remotely access the equipment while an election is in progress. In the early days of electronic voting machines, Democrats, myself included, complained about these issues. Dominion took over several voting machine companies that were noted for having said security issues. In addition, ownership transparency of Dominion has been questioned. There could be several reasons for this, including the possibility that someone really wants to avoid being discovered to have a conflict of interest or worse.

Following the money, such as inspecting the source documents of Dominion, may lead to some interesting insights. Combining apparent extreme "statistical anomalies" in the 2020 election, the demonstrated vulnerability of voting machines in general, the lack of transparency by Democrat election officials, obstructionist behavior by Democrat election officials, Democrat continuous vitriol against Trump, and a pattern of Democrat weaponization of the justice system for political purposes as suggested by multiple failed investigations against Trump leads to a reasonable conclusion the Democrats were capable of committing election fraud for political gain at the expense of our Democracy, the people, and Mr. Trump.

While the preceding paragraph may constitute circumstantial evidence, motive, or probable cause for an investigation, it is not proof election fraud positively happened. However, you have no doubt heard the saying if it walks like a duck...

 

[Cuddles]

A couple of days ago I felt compelled to do some research on the various electronic voting machine companies. I found there is a long history of security and transparency issues, including the ability to remotely access the equipment while an election is in progress. In the early days of electronic voting machines, Democrats, myself included, complained about these issues. Dominion took over several voting machine companies that were noted for having said security issues. In addition, ownership transparency of Dominion has been questioned. There could be several reasons for this, including the possibility that someone really wants to avoid being discovered to have a conflict of interest or worse.

Following the money, such as inspecting the source documents of Dominion, may lead to some interesting insights. Combining apparent extreme "statistical anomalies" in the 2020 election, the demonstrated vulnerability of voting machines in general, the lack of transparency by Democrat election officials, obstructionist behavior by Democrat election officials, Democrat continuous vitriol against Trump, and a pattern of Democrat weaponization of the justice system for political purposes as suggested by multiple failed investigations against Trump leads to a reasonable conclusion the Democrats were capable of committing election fraud for political gain at the expense of our Democracy, the people, and Mr. Trump.

While the preceding paragraph may constitute circumstantial evidence, motive, or probable cause for an investigation, it is not proof election fraud positively happened. However, you have no doubt heard the saying if it walks like a duck...

you could just say "yes" instead of writing the story to convince yourself.

 

[Tony Stark]

A couple of days ago I felt compelled to do some research on the various electronic voting machine companies. I found there is a long history of security and transparency issues, including the ability to remotely access the equipment while an election is in progress. In the early days of electronic voting machines, Democrats, myself included, complained about these issues. Dominion took over several voting machine companies that were noted for having said security issues. In addition, ownership transparency of Dominion has been questioned. There could be several reasons for this, including the possibility that someone really wants to avoid being discovered to have a conflict of interest or worse.

Following the money, such as inspecting the source documents of Dominion, may lead to some interesting insights. Combining apparent extreme "statistical anomalies" in the 2020 election, the demonstrated vulnerability of voting machines in general, the lack of transparency by Democrat election officials, obstructionist behavior by Democrat election officials, Democrat continuous vitriol against Trump, and a pattern of Democrat weaponization of the justice system for political purposes as suggested by multiple failed investigations against Trump leads to a reasonable conclusion the Democrats were capable of committing election fraud for political gain at the expense of our Democracy, the people, and Mr. Trump.

While the preceding paragraph may constitute circumstantial evidence, motive, or probable cause for an investigation, it is not proof election fraud positively happened. However, you have no doubt heard the saying if it walks like a duck...

 

[BeautifulStranger]

you could just say "yes" instead of writing the story to convince yourself.

Unlike some on this site, I usually support my statements and opinions. I'd support my previous statement, but as a gesture of good will, I won't.

 

[BeautifulStranger]

I have a part two...

 

[Cuddles]