Everyday Conservative Virtue Signaling

Dude... your lack of ability to see the forest thru the tree's misconstrues my for fun literary flare with the bigger picture.

This:



It really has nothing to do with rabies you simpleton.
Omg. :banghead:
We're in trouble if this is the representative IQ of the generation behind the boomers.

Problem is you think this is news to me, I know that they passed a pre-emption law, thing is that they passed this law to fuck with local laws like the one I mentioned - that's the whole point. The point is that there is a state law that prevents the very same local ordinance of water breaks. Do you understand now?
 
Problem is you think this is news to me, I know that they passed a pre-emption law, thing is that they passed this law to fuck with local laws like the one I mentioned - that's the whole point. The point is that there is a state law that prevents the very same local ordinance of water breaks. Do you understand now?
Show us one instance of a company denying a water break that led to one of the deaths out of however many heat deaths you quoted above.
 
Show us one instance of a company denying a water break that led to one of the deaths out of however many heat deaths you quoted above.

If it was not an issue, why is there a state pre-emption law on the topic at all?

At least 53 Texas workers have died since 2010 from heat-related illness, the number-one weather-related killer in the world, an analysis by NPR and Columbia Journalism Investigations found. Most of heat-related deaths in the U.S. happen on days hotter than 90 degrees, according to the report.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/new-texas...inances-protecting-outdoor/story?id=100272286
 
If it was not an issue, why is there a state pre-emption law on the topic at all?

At least 53 Texas workers have died since 2010 from heat-related illness, the number-one weather-related killer in the world, an analysis by NPR and Columbia Journalism Investigations found. Most of heat-related deaths in the U.S. happen on days hotter than 90 degrees, according to the report.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/new-texas...inances-protecting-outdoor/story?id=100272286
Yeah? And? We're they denied water? What's your point.
53 since 2010?!!
Bfd... and that was before the Death Star Law? Lol. So what are you saying? 53 is a good number or a bad number? You're posting it to prove your point, so I assume its a bad number. Your logic is the equivalent of a cat chasing its tail.

Dude, the article was stupid, as I said, it could be applied to dozens and dozens of things that municipalities formerly had say over. Where in the law does it deny water to people? Quit being so hell bent on your agenda. Not that I have any problem with your opinion of things, but when it gets in the way of clear thinking and seeing things for what they are... then you have a problem. But somehow I think you know I'm right about that article.
 
Yeah? And? We're they denied water? What's your point.
53 since 2010?!!
Bfd... and that was before the Death Star Law? Lol. So what are you saying? 53 is a good number or a bad number? You're posting it to prove your point, so I assume its a bad number. Your logic is the equivalent of a cat chasing its tail.

Dude, the article was stupid, as I said, it could be applied to dozens and dozens of things that municipalities formerly had say over. Where in the law does it deny water to people? Quit being so hell bent on your agenda. Not that I have any problem with your opinion of things, but when it gets in the way of clear thinking and seeing things for what they are... then you have a problem. But somehow I think you know I'm right about that article.

What are you even talking about - if there is no problem with water breaks then what is the problem with the local ordinances? Why is the state interfering with this nonsense pre-emption bullshit?
 
What are you even talking about - if there is no problem with water breaks then what is the problem with the local ordinances? Why is the state interfering with this nonsense pre-emption bullshit?
Dude... you sound ignorant.
IT IS NOT ABOUT WATER BREAKS!!!!
Here's the bill. Read it yourself.




By: Burrows H.B. No. 2127



A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT
relating to state preemption of certain municipal and county
regulation.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
SECTION 1. This Act shall be known as the Texas Regulatory
Consistency Act.
SECTION 2. The legislature finds that:
(1) the State of Texas has historically been the
exclusive regulator of many aspects of commerce and trade in this
state;
(2) in recent years, several local jurisdictions have
sought to establish their own regulations of commerce that are
different than the state's regulations; and
(3) the local regulations have led to a patchwork of
regulations across this state that provide inconsistency.
SECTION 3. The purpose of this Act is to provide regulatory
consistency across this state and return the historic exclusive
regulatory powers to the state where those powers belong.
SECTION 4. Chapter 1, Agriculture Code, is amended by
adding Section 1.004 to read as follows:
Sec. 1.004. FIELD PREEMPTION. The provisions of this code
preclude municipalities or counties from adopting or enforcing an
ordinance, order, rule, or policy in a field occupied by a provision
of this code unless explicitly authorized by statute. A municipal
or county ordinance, order, rule, or policy that violates this
section is void and unenforceable.
SECTION 5. Title 5, Civil Practice and Remedies Code, is
amended by adding Chapter 102A to read as follows:
CHAPTER 102A. MUNICIPAL AND COUNTY LIABILITY FOR PREEMPTED
REGULATION
Sec. 102A.001. LIABILITY FOR CERTAIN PREEMPTED REGULATION.
Any person, including a taxpayer, adversely affected by a municipal
or county ordinance, order, rule, or policy adopted or enforced by a
municipality, county, municipal official or county official acting
in their official capacity in violation of any of the following
provisions has standing to bring and may bring an action against the
municipality, county or official:
(1) Section 1.004, Agriculture Code;
(2) Section 1.004, Finance Code;
(3) Section 30.005, Insurance Code;
(4) Section 1.005, Labor Code;
(5) Section 1.003, Natural Resources Code; or
(6) Section 1.004, Occupations Code.
Sec. 102A.002. REMEDIES. A claimant is entitled to recover
in an action brought under this chapter:
(1) declaratory and injunctive relief; and
(2) costs and reasonable attorney's fees.
Sec. 102A.003. IMMUNITY WAIVER AND PROHIBITED DEFENSES.
(a) Governmental immunity, official immunity, and qualified
immunity, as applicable, are waived to the extent of liability
created by this chapter.
(b) Official and qualified immunity may not be asserted as a
defense in an action brought under this chapter.
Sec. 102A.004. VENUE. Notwithstanding any other law,
including Chapter 15, a claimant may bring an action under this
chapter in any county in this state. If the action is brought in a
venue authorized by this section, the action may not be transferred
to a different venue without the written consent of all parties.
Section 102A.005. PERSON. For purposes of this section
"person" means an individual, corporation, business trust, estate,
trust, partnership, limited liability company, association, joint
venture, government, governmental subdivision, agency or
instrumentality, public corporation, or any legal or commercial
entity, or protected series or registered series of a for-profit
entity.
SECTION 6. Chapter 1, Finance Code, is amended by adding
Section 1.004 to read as follows:
Sec. 1.004. FIELD PREEMPTION. The provisions of this code
preclude municipalities and counties from adopting or enforcing an
ordinance, order, rule, or policy in a field occupied by a provision
of this code unless explicitly authorized by statute. A municipal
or county ordinance, order, rule, or policy that violates this
section is void and unenforceable.
SECTION 7. Chapter 30, Insurance Code, is amended by adding
Section 30.005 to read as follows:
Sec. 30.005. FIELD PREEMPTION. The provisions of this code
preclude municipalities and counties from adopting or enforcing an
ordinance, order, rule, or policy in a field occupied by a provision
of this code unless explicitly authorized by statute. A municipal
or county ordinance, order, rule, or policy that violates this
section is void and unenforceable.
SECTION 8. Chapter 1, Labor Code, is amended by adding
Section 1.005 to read as follows:
Sec. 1.005. FIELD PREEMPTION. The provisions of this code
preclude municipalities and counties from adopting or enforcing an
ordinance, order, rule, or policy in a field occupied by a provision
of this code unless explicitly authorized by statute. A municipal
or county ordinance, order, rule, or policy that violates this
section is void and unenforceable.
SECTION 9. Chapter 1, Natural Resources Code, is amended by
adding Section 1.003 to read as follows:
Sec. 1.003. FIELD PREEMPTION. The provisions of this code
preclude municipalities and counties from adopting or enforcing an
ordinance, order, rule, or policy in a field occupied by a provision
of this code unless explicitly authorized by statute. A municipal
or county ordinance, order, rule, or policy that violates this
section is void and unenforceable.
SECTION 10. Chapter 1, Occupations Code, is amended by
adding Section 1.004 to read as follows:
Sec. 1.004. FIELD PREEMPTION. The provisions of this code
preclude municipalities and counties from adopting or enforcing an
ordinance, order, rule, or policy in a field occupied by a provision
of this code unless explicitly authorized by statute. A municipal
or county ordinance, order, rule, or policy that violates this
section is void and unenforceable.
SECTION 11. Chapter 102A, Civil Practice and Remedies Code,
as added by this Act, applies only to a cause of action that accrues
on or after the effective date of this Act.
SECTION 12. This Act takes effect immediately if it
receives a vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to each
house, as provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas Constitution.
If this Act does not receive the vote necessary for immediate
effect, this Act takes effect September 1, 2023.
 
It's like all these Republican state legislators all got together and passed this sweeping bill for the express purpose of denying folks out working in the Permian....

(Most probably dyed in the wool Maga type workers at that, and certainly legislators' most devout and loyal constituents)

.... water breaks.

Common sense is not your strong point is it?

Gulping down the water (no pun intended) from some far left writer who had nothing better to whine about that day and claiming it as a rallying point here on ET... I mean dude... you really fail the critical thinking test on every front with this one.

And tbh, I hope you're trolling me here, because if not, all your other posts just got seriously diluted. I mean maybe I gave you too much credit, I put your extreme leftist propensities aside, but hell I thought you had at least some modicum of intelligence. But if you don't posses the cerebral wherewithal to see that this article could be tailored to write about 100's of different individual nit-pickings due to the myriad of things it encompasses.... my god man... you exist in a very strange world of your own. Quit sucking down all that water like a sheep. Use your brain, that's what its there for.
 
If you had 'less than a week' for a worker to die of heat stroke after Greg Abbott repealed measures to protect workers against heat related illness, come forth to claim a cold shower and beverage.

Worker Dies of Heat Stroke 6 days After Abbott Signs Bill Repealing Heat Protections
https://jordanbarab.com/confinedspa...abbott-signs-bill-repealing-heat-protections/
Well apparently the current regulations aren't working real well since the Bill doesn't go into effect until September. No?

And as I read things, the Bill doesn't change the laws set forth by Austin and Dallas, or any other city regarding ANY ordinance, it merely gives state Legislators the ability to overrule a local municipalities law if they so desire.

But it makes for nice click bait on whatever media outlet publishes an article sensationalizing nothing.
 
From 2015:

Aiming to prevent heat-related deaths and illnesses, the Dallas City Council on Wednesday approved a measure requiring construction companies to give their employees a 10-minute rest break every four hours.

Dallas will join only Austin in often-sweltering Texas to mandate breaks at construction sites.

____________________________________

Now, where in this new Bill does it specifically nix a 10 minute break for 4 hours of work?
Can someone give me a link?

Besides... where is OSHA at in all this?
They're the ones in charge of workplace safety. And they trump the individual states.
Don't tell me, lemmee guess.... Inb4... "it's all Trump's fault" :rolleyes:

And GWB... I bet you can figure out a way to pin it on Elon too.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top