Ever had a supernatural experience?
- Thread starter hapaboy
- Start date
Yes I argue with logic.... which actually requires a brain.
LongDip on the other hand, argues with the LACK of a brain.
He is incapable of comprehending basic logic.
Of all the people on ET, LongDip needs the logic primer
more than anyone
But the real pathetic part is.... he follows me around ET
like some psychotic stalker ex girlfriend who "just cant let go".
LMAOOOOOOOO
His ego was so completely shattered in previous debates with
me that he can only lash out with personal attacks everywhere
I go. Sad....really sad. Get help dude.
But what can you expect from a severe alcoholic like longshot?
peace
axeman
LongDip on the other hand, argues with the LACK of a brain.
He is incapable of comprehending basic logic.
Of all the people on ET, LongDip needs the logic primer
more than anyone
But the real pathetic part is.... he follows me around ET
like some psychotic stalker ex girlfriend who "just cant let go".
LMAOOOOOOOO
His ego was so completely shattered in previous debates with
me that he can only lash out with personal attacks everywhere
I go. Sad....really sad. Get help dude.
But what can you expect from a severe alcoholic like longshot?
peace
axeman
Longshot clearly has a problem with the identification
of fallacious arguments because he is so guilty of
committing them himself.
I catch longshot in so many fallacies, all he can do is
mock and taunt me for shooting his bad arguments down
left and right
Thats right longdip....it IS a strawman. Get over it.
Calling them as I see em
Maybe if you grew 2 or 3 more brain cells you would be able
to identify them as well What moron.
Back to the bottle Longdip. Go drink yourself asleep and
stop crapping all over this thread with a flame war you IDIOT
peace
axeman
of fallacious arguments because he is so guilty of
committing them himself.
I catch longshot in so many fallacies, all he can do is
mock and taunt me for shooting his bad arguments down
left and right
Thats right longdip....it IS a strawman. Get over it.
Calling them as I see em
Maybe if you grew 2 or 3 more brain cells you would be able
to identify them as well
What moron.Back to the bottle Longdip. Go drink yourself asleep and
stop crapping all over this thread with a flame war you IDIOT
peace
axeman
Alright, looks like we came to the end of the debate.
First Axe insists that the stories are flawed. Then when stories are brought up that don't hvae flaws, then it's the people who told the stories who can't be believed. Obviously, Axe will never accept proof, cause whatever proof will be brought, Axe will find a reason why it's not proof. (although I'm not sure some of the bizarre stuff Axe has been writing here can be described as "reasons"). This reminds me of the first conference by bible code critics several years back. During her speech, one of the organisers, a mathematician, said the following "bible codes CANNOT be real", and why? "Because if the codes were real, then that would mean that the bible is divine".
Without getting into whether the codes are real or not, that really says it all, doesn't it? People like that mathematician (or Axe) will never LET themselves be convinced, because that wouldn't fit with their view of the world...
Goodnight all, I'm off to discuss things with people who are actually willing to listen honestly...
First Axe insists that the stories are flawed. Then when stories are brought up that don't hvae flaws, then it's the people who told the stories who can't be believed. Obviously, Axe will never accept proof, cause whatever proof will be brought, Axe will find a reason why it's not proof. (although I'm not sure some of the bizarre stuff Axe has been writing here can be described as "reasons"). This reminds me of the first conference by bible code critics several years back. During her speech, one of the organisers, a mathematician, said the following "bible codes CANNOT be real", and why? "Because if the codes were real, then that would mean that the bible is divine".
Without getting into whether the codes are real or not, that really says it all, doesn't it? People like that mathematician (or Axe) will never LET themselves be convinced, because that wouldn't fit with their view of the world...
Goodnight all, I'm off to discuss things with people who are actually willing to listen honestly...
Quote from axeman:
Longshot clearly has a problem with the identification
of fallacious arguments because he is so guilty of
committing them himself.
I catch longshot in so many fallacies, all he can do is
mock and taunt me for shooting his bad arguments down
left and right
Thats right longdip....it IS a strawman. Get over it.
Calling them as I see em
Maybe if you grew 2 or 3 more brain cells you would be able
to identify them as well
Back to the bottle Longdip. Go drink yourself asleep and
stop crapping all over this thread with a flame war you IDIOT
peace
axeman
you won't find the "messy" truth in a logic primer you total freaking ass clown...
logic is a tool not the end all be all..
haha but you will never understand this..
the truth does not exist in "STRAW MAN! STRAW MAN!" hahha
is why i laugh at you almost every day now..
i am sure others feel the same; YOU OUR ASS CLOWN
Wow... thats pretty funny stuff.
You claim the stories are flawless?
For example: The story you told about visiting the rabbi
and the girl suddenly getting sick ISNT flawed?
You are drawing a conclusion based on a SINGLE DATA POINT
and your claiming its flawless?
"Obviously, Axe will never accept proof, cause whatever proof will be brought, Axe will find a reason why it's not proof"
Obviously? I see.... so because you have FAILED to provide
anything that remotely qualifies as "proof", you must know
commit the poisoning the well fallacy, and simply claim I will
reject everything because I will find a reason why its not proof??
Did you ever consider the possibility that my reasons are VALID???
Why dont you try and argue the point instead of running away??
" (although I'm not sure some of the bizarre stuff Axe has been writing here can be described as "reasons")."
An empty claim. Care to quote something I said that
is bizarre??? For example?? Or is this simply a
covert way of attacking your opponent?
"This reminds me of the first conference by bible code critics several years back"
Ummmm.... a poor analogy. Since I would never use that reason.
Without getting into whether the codes are real or not, that really says it all, doesn't it? People like that mathematician (or Axe) will never LET themselves be convinced, because that wouldn't fit with their view of the world...
Patently false. I am easily convincible. You must simply
provide evidence which you have clearly FAILED to do.
Sorry... but "daddy said so", doesnt make it true
"Goodnight all, I'm off to discuss things with people who are actually willing to listen honestly"
Thats right...when the going gets tough... run away like
a good little theist
Common rabbi... im sure you can do better than that
peace
axeman
You claim the stories are flawless?
For example: The story you told about visiting the rabbi
and the girl suddenly getting sick ISNT flawed?
You are drawing a conclusion based on a SINGLE DATA POINT
and your claiming its flawless?
"Obviously, Axe will never accept proof, cause whatever proof will be brought, Axe will find a reason why it's not proof"
Obviously? I see.... so because you have FAILED to provide
anything that remotely qualifies as "proof", you must know
commit the poisoning the well fallacy, and simply claim I will
reject everything because I will find a reason why its not proof??
Did you ever consider the possibility that my reasons are VALID???
Why dont you try and argue the point instead of running away??
" (although I'm not sure some of the bizarre stuff Axe has been writing here can be described as "reasons")."
An empty claim. Care to quote something I said that
is bizarre??? For example?? Or is this simply a
covert way of attacking your opponent?
"This reminds me of the first conference by bible code critics several years back"
Ummmm.... a poor analogy. Since I would never use that reason.
Without getting into whether the codes are real or not, that really says it all, doesn't it? People like that mathematician (or Axe) will never LET themselves be convinced, because that wouldn't fit with their view of the world...
Patently false. I am easily convincible. You must simply
provide evidence which you have clearly FAILED to do.
Sorry... but "daddy said so", doesnt make it true
"Goodnight all, I'm off to discuss things with people who are actually willing to listen honestly"
Thats right...when the going gets tough... run away like
a good little theist
Common rabbi... im sure you can do better than that
peace
axeman