Quote from makloda:
So let me get this straight. Your mom got $12 an hour for a job that required a highschool diploma for an education.
$12 in 1975 @ 3.5% annualized inflation equals $12*1.035^33 (33 years) = $37.32
So the equivalent wage (in today's Dollars) your mom earned was $37.32 an hour or $5,971 a month, for a job that requires relatively little education nor is abnormally dangerous. Either you're lying or your mom's boss was delusional paying that wage.
You expect $70k annually today working 8 hours in a grocery store? Give me a break. If you want higher income, get yourself a higher education. It's that simple.
Ok youâre not getting it. This thread is called âEven with inflation it took one worker to support a family.â Iâm telling you why and you donât want to hear it. You know, denial is not a river in Egypt.
$37 (it is a large local union grocery store) an hour to be a cashier is rediculous nowadays, but back then that was the standard. This crap about needing a college degree to make a decent wage was non existent then. Cashiers got $37 and college educated people got more. The ceo got maybe 30 times that, or 2.2 million (todayâs dollars) a year. Now the cashier gets $10 and the ceo gets 400 times that or 8 million.
It was just the standard, you worked, then you got paid a decent wage. Now, you work and they say, âoh weâre going to cut your pay because we can get this immigrant over hear to do it for less. If you donât like it, you can quit.â So thatâs why it takes 2 incomes to support a family now. Wages have been suppressed. You can come up with whatever stats you want that says whatever, but everybody knows one thing, the rich/poor gap has widened exponentially in the past 30 years, which results with the poor and middle class being constantly squeezed. Nobody can deny this. A cashier used to make $37, now a college grad would be lucky to get that after 4 years and thousands in student loans. All that money they used to get paid is going somewhere else.
Quote from makloda:
What are the results if you exchange average cost of a home ("average" homes have become much bigger in the last 30 years) with average metropolitan apartment rents per sqft.
Again, what planet are you on? Yes the average house might be âbigger now.â But youâre not taking into account all of the newly built apartments and condoâs. 30 and 50 years ago, they were scarce, now theyâre everywhere.
This is another example of the widening rich/poor gap. It used to be everybody has a small single family house. Now, some have large single family homes, some townhouses, and a whole lot of people live in small apartments. Therefore, it's probably difficult to determine the average house size.
I heard that housing prices have increased 70% in the past 10 years. I'm not sure if that is before or after the crash, but regardless, wages have not gone up that much and everybody knows it. Housing prices kept going up because the money could be borrowed. Now it can't be so easily, so a huge housing correction is justified to bring prices back in alignment with stagnant wages.